Here are the aggregate results of the alternate polls conducted so far (with the results of the Korean community poll still to come). The spreadsheet I created to tally these results can be found here.
For my part, I see some very clear messages, and some clear commonalities with the results of the first Exploratory ZCAP Dev Fund poll.
The results of questions 7 and 8 are obviously of interest to me personally. I plan to open a forum poll to delve more deeply into the question of whether the community thinks that ZF’s activities deliver value to the Zcash mission and ecosystem but, for now, I’m curious about one thing.
All else being equal, you would expect that the impact an organisation has on the Zcash ecosystem would be broadly proportional to the resources at its disposal, in which case the ranking should be ZCG top, ECC second and ZF bottom. The net scores reflect that ranking (ZCG +4; ECC +1; ZF -4), so I’m curious…
If you were a respondent in these polls, did you take the disparity in funding between the three Dev Fund organisations into account when considering their impact on the Zcash ecosystem?