# Coinholder Polling on Governance and Funding

**URL:** <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [April 7, 2025, 2:28pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812 "2025-04-07T14:28:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 2:28pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/1 "2025-04-07T14:28:41Z")

</div>

Thank you to everyone who participated in the coinholder [practice vote](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coin-voting-2-0-participate-in-a-test-poll/50560/35). With the test poll now complete, we’re preparing for coinholder polling on funding model ZIPs, which is scheduled to begin on **Thursday, April 17** , alongside the ZCAP and ZAC polls.

We’re reopening the registration period to allow more users to participate. For this vote, **the registration window will run from Block 2,663,885 (September 30, 2024) through 5:00 PM Pacific / 8:00 PM Eastern / 12:00 AM UTC on Wednesday, April 16**. If you already moved all your ZEC into the Orchard pool for the practice vote, there’s no need to do it again. If you haven’t registered yet, or have additional ZEC you’d like to include, now is the time to move those funds into Orchard.

**We’re also looking for community members to help run voting servers for the upcoming poll**. The Coin Voting 2.0 system relies on a dedicated blockchain secured by CometBFT and maintained by a group of validators, known as voting authorities. If there’s only one authority, there’s a risk that votes could be selectively included or excluded. However, with at least four independent validators, the system becomes resistant to manipulation, so long as two-thirds are honest. This ensures results are finalized through consensus, rather than by a single centralized operator.

If you’re interested in running a voting authority or have questions about what’s involved, please respond below or reach out to **@dismad** or me. We’ll be sharing more details about the upcoming governance poll soon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 5:35pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/2 "2025-04-07T17:35:19Z")

</div>

> [@Transparent ZEC voting mechanism](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/transparent-zec-voting-mechanism/50703/):
>
> “I’m inclined to say that we should establish a process to ensure transparent voting is included alongside shielded voting if coinholders are going to have a greater role in governance and funding decisions. If a proposal like the Community & Coinholder (C&C) model is implemented, we should aim to maximize participation by allowing users of wallets like Trust Wallet and Trezor to take part, even if exchange-held ZEC is out of scope for now.” – [Community Polling on Funding Model ZIPs - #87 by a…](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/community-polling-on-funding-model-zips/50617/87)

How do you think ZEC holders using t-addrs should participate? They also need to have the same chance to prepare for this vote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 7, 2025, 5:46pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/3 "2025-04-07T17:46:50Z")

</div>

On it. I’ll put together a detailed process for transparent voting and follow up with next steps later this week.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hanh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/hanh/32/27853_2.png) [@hanh](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/hanh)\
**Post date:** [April 8, 2025, 1:47am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/4 "2025-04-08T01:47:56Z")

</div>

We can improve the shielded coin voting system to include transparent as well. If it is something you want, I will submit a grant extension.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 12:09am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/5 "2025-04-09T00:09:05Z")

</div>

> [@aquietinvestor](#):
>
> **We’re also looking for community members to help run voting servers for the upcoming poll**. The Coin Voting 2.0 system relies on a dedicated blockchain secured by CometBFT and maintained by a group of validators, known as voting authorities. If there’s only one authority, there’s a risk that votes could be selectively included or excluded. However, with at least four independent validators, the system becomes resistant to manipulation, so long as two-thirds are honest.

We’re looking for two more community members to volunteer as validators.

@Autotunafish, @james_katz, @zancas: Are you interested in helping out?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![james\_katz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/james_katz/32/26780_2.png) [@james\_katz](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/james_katz)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 12:48am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/6 "2025-04-09T00:48:18Z")

</div>

Sure, it will be a pleasure to participate!  
What about system requirements? Anything specify? Will it need to have a 24/7 server?

**update**  
@dismad is already helping me setup everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 2:10pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/7 "2025-04-09T14:10:57Z")

</div>

> [@aquietinvestor](#):
>
> We’re looking for two more community members to volunteer as validators.

I’d gladly do it. Can we make the instructions public?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dismad](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/dismad/32/18432_2.png) [@dismad](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/dismad)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 4:32pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/8 "2025-04-09T16:32:48Z")

</div>

> <https://github.com/hhanh00/zcash-vote-server/blob/main/doc/deploy.md>

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/7/f/7fc68af8e3e2b702f4bbf760d4667a688547bac1.jpeg "Zcash Vote Multi Validators") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDamln2BQ9s)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2025, 10:59pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/9 "2025-04-09T22:59:52Z")

</div>

Maybe ask someone from the ECC?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2025, 1:52pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/10 "2025-04-10T13:52:22Z")

</div>

Or QEDIT? How about QEDIT helps with this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2025, 1:25am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/11 "2025-04-11T01:25:13Z")

</div>

It would be awesome to get some [anon cypherpunks](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/call-for-anon-cypherpunks-in-zcash/50549/) to volunteer as validators!

Thanks @dismad for the instructions, I’ll review and test.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 10:54am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/12 "2025-04-13T10:54:49Z")

</div>

There doesn’t appear to be an user-friendly way to participate in a transparent coinholder poll. In previous transparent polls (before a shielded coinholder voting mechanism existed) users would transfer ZEC from a shielded address or another transparent address into a transparent address using Zecwallet Lite. They would then include their vote in the memo field of a small transaction sent to the poll address. It was a rather straightforward process. However, now that shielded voting exists, that process is no longer relevant since you can now vote using your Orchard notes. Transparent-only wallets like Trust Wallet don’t support the memo field, so they can’t be used for this kind of poll.

Given those constraints, the best path forward seems to be the process outlined by @outgoing.doze below, which involves signing a transaction. In addition to what he outlines, it will also be necessary to check the signature. Also, we should consider how to implement this in a way that avoids unnecessary deanonymization of wallets.

> [@Transparent ZEC voting mechanism](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/transparent-zec-voting-mechanism/50703/1):
>
> This may be the best possible design to vote with transparent address, but I would like to suggest one that, to me, seems a lot easier. Maybe it’s flawed somewhere, in which case hopefully someone can point out where:
> 
> 1. Sign a message with a user wallet and post it on the forum between a specific date and time window; like your example ( Sample Answer: `1A; 2E Let’s make more Zcash Swag; 3Y`). On future votes, signed messages should be published on a more neutral place.
> 2. Using the API of a Zcash blockchain explorer, we find out what is the lowest amount of ZEC stored on each ZEC address that has signed a message, between the dates of the vote.
> 
> And that’s it! It’s not written on chain but what does it change really? The checking for the lowest amount of ZEC stored on each ZEC address is to prevent voting twice with the same tokens.

> [@Transparent ZEC voting mechanism](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/transparent-zec-voting-mechanism/50703/4):
>
> > [@Transparent ZEC voting mechanism](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/transparent-zec-voting-mechanism/50703/1):
> >
> > Using the API of a Zcash blockchain explorer, we find out what is the lowest amount of ZEC stored on each ZEC address that has signed a message, between the dates of the vote.
> 
> Ok here’s a solution that can be done manually for now and scripted later whenever we have API access:
> 
> Once the vote is over, we use zcashexplorer.app to check two things:
> 
> 1. That no transfer has been done during the voting period
> 2. The balance
> 
> Example: `https://mainnet.zcashexplorer.app/address/t1VydNnkjBzfL1iAMyUbwGKJAF7PgvuCfMY?s=2821396&e=2843789`
> 
> Take note of the `s=2821396&e=2843789` representing the starting and ending points of the vote.
> 
> With API access we could allow transfers during the vote and just use the lowest balance during the voting period but given we may have to check things manually, for this one we would need to ask for no balance transfers to make it easier to review manually.
> 
> If 100 people vote using their transparent address, with about 30 seconds per address check, the process would take less than an hour to review. Three people could do this for good measure and ideally report identical results.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 7:53pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/13 "2025-04-13T19:53:09Z")

</div>

Given there is little interest for it on the forum, and none of the wallet are broadcasting the vote to ZEC holders at large, I assume the number of transparent votes will be low.

However, in addition to protecting the anonymity of wallets, we need to protect the transparent vote from a Sybil attack. That is because the reviewing method is manual so it is important that the time of people reviewing the vote is respected.

To protect the anonymity of wallet holders, I suggest votes (signed messages) are sent to a shielded wallet where the viewing key is shared with the community so anyone can review the votes. The character limit being 512 if not mistaken, should be plenty. The format could be as simple as this:

```auto
$voteDetails

$address

$signature

```

The extra line in between will make it easier easier to review visually.

Example (ignore invalid signature):

```auto
1A; 2E Let’s make more Zcash Swag; 3Y

t1VydNnkjBzfL1iAMyUbwGKJAF7PgvuCfMY

ICrKSQjLORZP/aUTluyf2sZXXK+HuKtxdBLt2RRCn2j5CxgZlccNmiMC2K104JuhHnvHd5cXgSzdZtGh9vgWAYA=

```

To protect from a Sybil attack, I suggest a payment of 1 ZEC is sent along with the vote. Anything less than 1 ZEC would therefore be ignored.

The wallet would be generated and controlled by a trusted member of the community, same person that would share the viewing key with the community. Would you accept this role @aquietinvestor ?

Just like the shielded vote, we’ll need something like four independent reviewers.

The accumulated ZEC of the vote could be split between the selected reviewers as a stipend for their work; it’s probably not going to be much. Hopefully the vote gets Sybil attacked with 10,000 votes, making super worth it to be a reviewer.

I would like to apply myself but I have now created a conflict of interest, as I could earn ZEC out of this. I am therefore applying as a reserve reviewer. Hopefully we can find four people to review this vote, but if we’re short, then I’m here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 8:32pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/14 "2025-04-13T20:32:02Z")

</div>

> [@outgoing.doze](#):
>
> none of the wallet are broadcasting the vote to ZEC holders at large

How do you picture this would work? Zashi or Ywallet sending a push notification to all the users of the wallets to vote?

Or are you thinking along the lines of just the wallets teams getting the word out via social media?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2025, 8:38pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/15 "2025-04-13T20:38:13Z")

</div>

> [@Shawn](#):
>
> How do you picture this would work?

Ideally, there is a clearly defined voting protocol implemented in all of our wallets and people can therefore vote in their wallet of choice. That would definitely raise the curiosity of our userbase and increase their interest for the details of the project.

This could for example be reserved to shielded tokens. Voting with transparent tokens should be a bit of a hassle. Ultimately we want to discourage that, while still having the option because for many reasons it still makes sense to offer it.

> [@Shawn](#):
>
> Zashi or Ywallet sending a push notification to all the users of the wallets to vote?

At very bare minimum we should have had that before the vote that has followed the end of the founders rewards. I don’t blame the wallet developers here though, but the planning and execution of that first vote that I am sorry to have to call a sham.

> [@Shawn](#):
>
> Or are you thinking along the lines of just the wallets teams getting the word out via social media?

Nice bonus, sure, but far from the most important imho.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2025, 9:37am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/16 "2025-04-14T09:37:06Z")

</div>

> [@outgoing.doze](#):
>
> The wallet would be generated and controlled by a trusted member of the community, same person that would share the viewing key with the community. Would you accept this role @aquietinvestor ?

I should be able to, but give me a couple of days to confirm. I’ll be traveling for the rest of April and want to double check the polling timeline to make sure I can be available when needed. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2025, 3:04pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/17 "2025-04-17T15:04:35Z")

</div>

Please note that the Dev Fund coinholder poll has not yet opened. Details will be shared later today. The poll will run from today through May 1 at 11:59 PM UTC.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2025, 5:51pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/18 "2025-04-19T17:51:35Z")

</div>

**The Coinholder Poll Is Now Open**

In November 2025, the current Dev Fund established under ZIP 1015 will expire, and 100% of block rewards will be allocated to miners. This poll is intended to assess whether there is community consensus to create a new Dev Fund and corresponding funding model, and if so, which proposal is preferred.

This coinholder poll contains two questions:

- The first asks which Dev Fund proposal you support, or whether you believe the Dev Fund should end and all block rewards should go to miners. Read more about the proposals [here](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/community-polling-on-funding-model-zips/50617).
- The second asks whether you support prioritizing a new Dev Fund and the implementation of a new funding model, even if doing so delays NU7.

**Shielded ZEC**

You can download the app to **vote shielded ZEC** here:

> **[Releases · hhanh00/zcash-vote-app](https://github.com/hhanh00/zcash-vote-app/releases/)**
>
> Contribute to hhanh00/zcash-vote-app development by creating an account on GitHub.

The poll will remain open until **Thursday, May 1 at 11:59 PM UTC**. Results will be shared after the poll closes.

**Please note that there is a separate URL for each question.**

Question #1

[https://zecvote.zone/election/f25446783de9082fa00cb5754a129fedb7f1d61ec6c144252f48077ac641e822](https://zecvote.zone/election/f25446783de9082fa00cb5754a129fedb7f1d61ec6c144252f48077ac641e822)

Question #2

[https://zecvote.zone/election/50b4a832ab4152861ff74a883e10a358f676ac3db5fb340f6a970b13a9e4b920](https://zecvote.zone/election/50b4a832ab4152861ff74a883e10a358f676ac3db5fb340f6a970b13a9e4b920)

If you’re using the desktop app, follow these steps to cast your vote:

1. Open the voting app.
2. Click **“New”** to start voting in a new election.
3. Enter the **election URL** and your **seed phrase**.
4. Save the election file when prompted.
5. Click **“Download Blockchain Data.”** Once it finishes processing, your voting power should appear.
6. Go to the **“Vote”** tab, select your choice, and enter the number of votes you want to cast.
7. You should see a **confirmation message** once your vote has been successfully submitted.

If you’d prefer to delegate your vote to **ZecHub** , you can use the following address:

`zvote1ftczn9j7vsn2hsjr0aqy6hnpsplmnxuh5aps2mtrugjzwrn9mpj2ykz2w5a7jmw3hxt2j6aluj9`

A couple important things to remember:

First, the safest way to participate now that the registration period has ended is to **move the ZEC out** of the wallet you’re using to vote. That way, when you enter the seed phrase to vote, the wallet will be empty, eliminating any risk of losing funds.

Second, when you create a new election, you’ll see a switch for “Internal Wallet” that allows the app to scan for funds stored in internal accounts, like those used by Zashi, Edge, eZcash, and other wallets that follow ZIP 316. This is to address an issue where users of these wallets did not see their full balance available to vote. If you hold ZEC in both internal and external accounts, you’ll need to cast your vote twice: once with the switch turned on, and once with it turned off.

Please use this thread to let us know if you run into any issues or to provide feedback on the overall process and user experience.

* * *

**Transparent ZEC**

If you want to vote ZEC held in a transparent address, follow the instructions outlined by @outgoing.doze:

> [@outgoing.doze](#):
>
> To protect the anonymity of wallet holders, I suggest votes (signed messages) are sent to a shielded wallet where the viewing key is shared with the community so anyone can review the votes. The character limit being 512 if not mistaken, should be plenty. The format could be as simple as this:
> 
> ```auto
> $voteDetails
> 
> $address
> 
> $signature
> 
> ```
> 
> The extra line in between will make it easier easier to review visually.
> 
> Example (ignore invalid signature):
> 
> ```auto
> 1A; 2E Let’s make more Zcash Swag; 3Y
> 
> t1VydNnkjBzfL1iAMyUbwGKJAF7PgvuCfMY
> 
> ICrKSQjLORZP/aUTluyf2sZXXK+HuKtxdBLt2RRCn2j5CxgZlccNmiMC2K104JuhHnvHd5cXgSzdZtGh9vgWAYA=
> 
> ```
> 
> To protect from a Sybil attack, I suggest a payment of 1 ZEC is sent along with the vote. Anything less than 1 ZEC would therefore be ignored.
> 
> The wallet would be generated and controlled by a trusted member of the community, same person that would share the viewing key with the community.

Orchard Address:

`u12vr7vpn4gqtu4a73h00qln8tyguj78ynls5cs9l776h27ssxh55xpazd2kmvtjkgsc8rhdwls352kmk0czkrgcxs26jgkhgsrs4pvgqk`

View Key:

`uview1t2g3e0n96zwhmu9utkfwex4vspuh0zps6e059x6j5y6l0eexj9nhhrn5mjl37fhj8dpfgc63p7a06eqvdk3jmtjsp4ur423pdxjq2cnhkpr69pxewf0qgav2ukvnyc8c8pkxqd5hfywmvtmm6j43cekeqcfu7qn6awc93vwm60d5pjd02c65z0yakrcqwj4crggv9jt6vpl7l7jj9mvj7ltshqgmhxdznk9rjf5t2j7mcg8rj9wsdwk4uhxkpgwfhgefnx49c2lf2yt05fpzmhg7x8lzmyqjxwr3chjl6kxwccevxhralfawnm2nzu6khwu8a5n6vk0fw76rfty5zgntacdgg64vn0qapupl50vz6az9d9zrxjnkdpvhr6rc6z9dp9s549har`

Birthday

`2894785`

Note: Funds cannot be moved during the voting period, which runs from April 16, 11:59 PM UTC (Block 2,892,057) to May 1 at 11:59 PM UTC (Block TBD).

Here are the questions for the poll:

 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/f/5/f50fa7841521139e11286f4df1947ac71bb6b785.png)

* * *

**Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)**

**Am I eligible to participate?**

To be eligible to participate, you must have moved ZEC into the Orchard pool or refreshed your notes during the registration period that ran from Block 2,663,885, which occurred around September 30, 2024, to Block 2,892,057, which occurred on Wednesday, April 16 around 11:59 PM UTC.

**Why is there a registration period?**

The registration period exists because it would be too computationally intensive to scan every Orchard note ever created. “Proof of balance” relies on the halo2 circuit, which, like Orchard itself, requires the wallet to compute witness data. Allowing participation from all Orchard notes since inception would mean downloading and processing the entire chain, which involves several gigabytes of data and would be impractical for most users. Limiting it to a registration window keeps the process efficient and accessible.

**Is there a minimum amount of ZEC needed to vote?**

Yes, you’ll need at least 0.01 ZEC to vote.

**Can you provide an overview of the election process?**

The Coin Voting 2.0 application differs from the previous voting system that was integrated into YWallet. This is a standalone application that is not currently integrated into any wallet, meaning users will need to download it separately. Each election consists of four steps: creation, hosting, voting, and auditing. The creator defines the vote parameters, including the question, answers, and eligible block range. The host runs the election logistics, providing a trustless online service for voters to submit ballots. Voters participate using their Orchard funds, with the option to delegate votes. Finally, auditors verify the results once the election concludes by using a revealed seed phrase to validate the ballots and report the final counts.

**Where can I download the Coin Voting 2.0 app?**

> **[Release v1.3.0 · hhanh00/zcash-vote-app](https://github.com/hhanh00/zcash-vote-app/releases/tag/v1.3.0)**
>
> 1.3.0 (2025-04-02)
> Features
> 
> add build notes (#58) (23fb94b)
> add busy spinner to Overview page (880f7bb)
> add spending and binding signatures (#11) (71c98aa)
> add workflow\_dispatch to linux build (#4...

**Is there a demo or walkthrough that explains how the voting process works?**

Yes, check out this video explainer from @dismad of ZecHub:

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/d/4/d422a5abca8f1f7134b1e92353c9e92b32125342.jpeg "Zcash Coin Voting 2.0 Demo") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPb1nI5iWrA)

**Are there any technical resources available for those who want to understand how the application works under the hood?**

Here are a couple resources that explains how the mechanism works:

> **[Project Proposal - Coin Voting](https://hhanh00.github.io/coin-voting-book/)**

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/a/e/ae5a990fa182a02ae504a7e51ae5886328b24a9a.jpeg "Coin Voting 2.0 with Hanh - ZconVI #zcash") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfQTSLpoH40)

**Why does the app show more votes than the amount of ZEC I hold?**

In the Coin Voting 2.0 system, the number of votes you receive corresponds directly to the amount of ZEC you hold. The system is designed to assign votes in whole numbers by multiplying your ZEC balance by 1,000. So, if you have 10 ZEC, you receive 10,000 votes. This approach makes vote counting and display simpler, while still preserving the proportional relationship between holdings and voting power.

**Is it possible for the voting authority to manipulate votes?**

The Coin Voting 2.0 system is designed to be secure and tamper-resistant, but like any system, it depends on how it’s deployed. Votes are submitted to a dedicated voting blockchain that runs using the CometBFT consensus engine. This blockchain is maintained by a set of validators, which are called voting authorities.

If there’s only one validator, a malicious operator could suppress or selectively include votes. However, when deployed with at least four independent validators, the system becomes resistant to manipulation—as long as two-thirds of them are honest, no single party can control the outcome. This approach ensures that votes are collected and finalized through a consensus mechanism, rather than relying on a centralized server.

**How many voting authorities are there for this poll?**

There are four voting authorities for this poll: @dismad, @hanh, @outgoing.doze, and @james_katz. For more information, see [this thread](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-poll-voting-authority-coordination/50908).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![outgoing.doze](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/outgoing.doze/32/37355_2.png) [@outgoing.doze](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/outgoing.doze)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2025, 6:01pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/19 "2025-04-19T18:01:24Z")

</div>

> [@aquietinvestor](#):
>
> If you’re using the desktop app

Sorry, what / where is the app?

> [@aquietinvestor](#):
>
> If you’d prefer to delegate your vote to **ZecHub** , you can use the following address:
> 
> `zvote1ftczn9j7vsn2hsjr0aqy6hnpsplmnxuh5aps2mtrugjzwrn9mpj2ykz2w5a7jmw3hxt2j6aluj9`

I guess I’ve been under a rock for a while. As much as I love this option, I seriously do not know anything about the opportunity to delegate and what it entails in this vote.

Finally, how can transparent wallets vote?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aquietinvestor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aquietinvestor/32/34528_2.png) [@aquietinvestor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aquietinvestor)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2025, 6:04pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812/20 "2025-04-19T18:04:13Z")

</div>

I’ll add an FAQ to my post to address your questions about the app. Working on that now.

Regarding the transparent vote, you outlined the process above, which I will update my post to reference. Also, I will create a new Orchard address and share the view key with the community.

Give me about an hour to get this all done.

[Next page](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/coinholder-polling-on-governance-and-funding/50812.md?page=2)
