# Conversation about structural change for ZCG forum?

**URL:** <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [February 7, 2025, 5:51am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264 "2025-02-07T05:51:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![machinesunmachine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/machinesunmachine/32/27149_2.png) [@machinesunmachine](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/machinesunmachine)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2025, 5:51am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/1 "2025-02-07T05:51:02Z")

</div>

Hi, I’m taking off my hat as team lead for Birdcalls and now i’m just writing to the community as plain-ol-Sunny. I know that other people than me have expressed the opinion that the ZCG process is toxic and discouraging. But I don’t think it has to be that way forever. It could be structured differently. It could be better. So in case there’s a meta-discussion to be had here, I’m creating a space for it here.

I’ll be recusing myself from this discussion since in my capacity as team lead of Birdcalls, I’m currently an aggrieved party 😅. I’ll probably also take a break from Zcash again for a while because I already feel burnt out, but I do want to reiterate that I believe in Zcash and I want y’all to be strong.

Here’s a few relevant quotes from the past week:

> [@Grant Application - Fix BTCPay Zcash plugin](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/grant-application-fix-btcpay-zcash-plugin/50204/3):
>
> I don’t like to bargain on grantees and I’m opposed to people “price dumping” on grant proposals as well since that discourages future presentations of grants creating a hostile environment that generates “low [psychological safety](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_safety)” in our community.

> [@Grant Application - Fix BTCPay Zcash plugin](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/grant-application-fix-btcpay-zcash-plugin/50204/47):
>
> coliseum-esque defend-to-the-death, grant-proposer-alone-against-the-community forum culture

> [@Zcash how it lost rank and value](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/zcash-how-it-lost-rank-and-value/50023/61):
>
> I would even go so far as to move the topic of ZCG, submission of projects as well as discussion and decision to a protected not public and visible area, as long as it is not handled professionally, it will do more harm than good.

I think that an interesting way to think about a community forum is as a social common space where the shared resource is our ‘focused attention.’ It’s easy for forum discussions to devolve into a tragedy of the commons where our limited resource, our focused attention, is wasted.

One of my favorite thinkers on how to successfully govern social common spaces was [Elinor Ostrim](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elinor_Ostrom). She won the Nobel Prize having spent most of her life studying real world situations where communities successfully shared scarce water resources for hundreds to thousands of years, without having to resort to privatization.

Communities avoid the tragedy of the commons by taking the time and care to put in place structures to properly incentivize responsible stewardship of common resources.

Here’s the Ostrom Workshop: [Ostrom Workshop: Indiana University](https://ostromworkshop.indiana.edu/index.html)  
Who knows, maybe Zcash could hire a consultant affiliated with the Ostrom Workshop to make professional suggestions for how to better structure the ZCG program. If you want them to do that though, please please don’t make them submit it as a grant proposal to the current public forum.

I’m just tossing out a few ideas to get people thinking.

One last thing to throw out there for the discussion -

 ![Screenshot 2025-02-06 at 11.48.04 PM](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/c/b/cb5f1996fc05cdb1f1402196418e512637f5d643.png)

I noticed this new user account because its very first ‘like’ was my comment saying I was too tired to keep responding in the grants forum. Then I realized that the account had already read 394 posts in 1 hour of read time. I thought it was a little odd. Then I remembered that we live in a world now where it would be trivial for an LLM to be trained on the Zcash forum and then unleashed into the forums to spew mostly coherent nonsense that wastes everyone’s time and attention, forever.

In my opinion, HHIROSHIMA is a little sus.

Perhaps it’s time to add two more reputation features to community profiles: a trust graph of whether someone originally invited you into the community, if so who that was; and a badge if anyone in the community has ever met you in person.

Last thing. Now I’m putting on my hat as a privacy professional: don’t forget that the state department doesn’t have to get you delisted from the exchanges if they can just insert enough monkey wrenches into your system that you fail to function.

Okay, I’m done here for now. I’m recusing myself now. Furthermore, I’m going to turn off notifications for Zash for a while. So if anyone specifically wants a response from me then please ask Jason or Zooko to send me a ping via text.

All best,  
Plain Ol’ Sunny

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HHIROSHIMA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/4491bb/32.png) [@HHIROSHIMA](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/HHIROSHIMA)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2025, 8:00am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/2 "2025-02-07T08:00:25Z")

</div>

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> In my opinion, HHIROSHIMA is a little sus.

It’s really hard to take you seriously anymore, i get the impression that you feel caught out and to be honest, that is my opinion.

You didn’t want to help at all, but saw the opportunity to make money quickly. That didn’t work out and now everyone else is to blame, although - and I’m sure of this - the majority of members here paid attention to the cost-benefit factor and now you feel totally attacked. Finally stop this manipulative behavior.

This drama what you are doing here meanwhile is deeply ridiculous and no, I don’t have to open a second account to tell you my opinion. 🤦‍♂️

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> Last thing. Now I’m putting on my hat as a privacy professional: don’t forget that the state department doesn’t have to get you delisted from the exchanges if they can just insert enough monkey wrenches into your system that you fail to function.

Agree with this point, because I have already thought about it too and urge everyone to keep  
a watchful eye on it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pacu](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/pacu/32/15383_2.png) [@pacu](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/pacu)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2025, 4:51pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/3 "2025-02-07T16:51:34Z")

</div>

Hello! I’d love to chat with you in private, just to hear you out. Ping me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2025, 5:18pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/4 "2025-02-07T17:18:53Z")

</div>

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> noticed this new user account because its very first ‘like’ was my comment saying I was too tired to keep responding in the grants forum. Then I realized that the account had already read 394 posts in 1 hour of read time.

Yes, these types of accounts are bots that create an account and “like” as many posts as possible to gain forum trust levels. They then remain dormant until someone posts something wallet related like “help my ZEC is stuck” then they send out a DM with fake “customer support” links. I delete or restrict trust levels for several of these types of accounts per week.

I also remove one or two accounts per week that are trying to post clearly AI generated content.

But that said, there are more active readers like Hiroshima who are real people that have a lot of time on their hands to be active on the forum. That doesn’t automatically make them a LLM AI bot.

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> Perhaps it’s time to add two more reputation features to community profiles: a trust graph of whether someone originally invited you into the community, if so who that was; and a badge if anyone in the community has ever met you in person.

We do have forum titles that I manually assign to users like @Autotunafish and @pacu who are trusted known members of the community

…

Regarding users questioning the cost of grant proposals ie: “price dumping” as Pacu put it. The entire purpose of having the discussion on an open public forum ( not just a private conversation with the applicant and [@ZcashGrants](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/groups/zcashgrants) ) is to question and get feedback from the broader community about the application.

The discussions here are ultimately something ZCG can take under advisement when considering the grant, or can choose to ignore all together.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![artkor](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/artkor/32/28573_2.png) [@artkor](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/artkor)\
**Post date:** [February 7, 2025, 5:34pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/5 "2025-02-07T17:34:58Z")

</div>

Hiroshima is definitely not a bot. There’s no doubt about it. Bots don’t have feelings.

There’s a lot of frustration about the market in all of us, it’s noticeable. But we need to be able to find a way to communicate without accusations and resentment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 3:00pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/6 "2025-02-25T15:00:31Z")

</div>

Are you asserting that you know @HHIROSHIMA isn’t an AI? That’s certainly what @artkor is saying.

I have strong reason to believe that neither @Shawn nor @artkor is an AI. But apriori, I have no strong evidence either way with respect to @HHIROSHIMA .

I think @machinesunmachine makes a good point that tools that help make that determination are needed… maybe even an entire communication platform that’s robust to inauthentic messaging…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HHIROSHIMA](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/4491bb/32.png) [@HHIROSHIMA](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/HHIROSHIMA)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 4:01pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/7 "2025-02-25T16:01:43Z")

</div>

> [@zancas](#):
>
> I have strong reason to believe that neither @Shawn nor @artkor is an AI. But apriori, I have no strong evidence either way with respect to @HHIROSHIMA .

I’m really starting to wonder what kind of stuff you guys are smoking. This is not normal anymore and such people are developers for zcash. Until just now I thought highly of you but now you have disqulified yourself to such an extent that I won’t even read your posts anymore and that as an AI 🙃

But before I forget, thanks for the compliment anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zerodartz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zerodartz/32/26722_2.png) [@zerodartz](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zerodartz)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 4:28pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/8 "2025-02-25T16:28:12Z")

</div>

i agree, u can’t be AI, too authentic

unless ur one of the top new AGI models 🤣

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 4:38pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/9 "2025-02-25T16:38:06Z")

</div>

> [@zancas](#):
>
> Are you asserting that you know @HHIROSHIMA isn’t an AI?

Yes, based on interactions with them and usage patterns on the forum I can say Hiroshima is not an AI.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aaal](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aaal/32/36133_2.png) [@aaal](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aaal)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 6:45pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/10 "2025-02-25T18:45:04Z")

</div>

_Is this to be an empathy test? Capillary dilation of the so-called blush response? Fluctuation of the pupil? Involuntary dilation of the iris?_

The fact is that the only-slightly-uncanny valley is not coming, it’s already here.

I’ve read way (way way) too much of this forum and I don’t think HH is a bot, but these days, especially if you’re being observant and very honest, it’s sometimes difficult to tell.

Anything we can do to promote awareness of where info is coming from is good. Protecting humans, particularly naive humans, from spam and propaganda is not easy and is important for a well functioning social group. The under-appreciated job of the mod is hard and getting harder all the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 7:36pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/11 "2025-02-25T19:36:27Z")

</div>

> [@aaal](#):
>
> is this to be an empathy test? Capillary dilation of the so-called blush response? Fluctuation of the pupil? Involuntary dilation of the iris?

Every forum member will have to perform the Baseline Test in person:

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/8/5/851ec8da58430e2363210a89702a94ef8535fba1.jpeg "Blade Runner 2049 Baseline Tests HD") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSb8gw4Z39Q)

😅

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aaal](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/aaal/32/36133_2.png) [@aaal](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/aaal)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2025, 8:54pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/12 "2025-02-25T20:54:50Z")

</div>

I tried to upload a cool image but I couldn’t get the forum to accept mine… ☹

so thanks for getting a correct reference into the right place 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 12:57am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/13 "2025-02-27T00:57:26Z")

</div>

Spoken like a well-trained guardian replicant. Welcome to the forums _Nexus 6-1740617817_!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 12:59am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/14 "2025-02-27T00:59:55Z")

</div>

“You’re not even close to baseline.” – The Overseer From Blade Runner

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2025, 1:00am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/15 "2025-02-27T01:00:52Z")

</div>

Well… also I’m hopeful that we’ll be welcoming to Intelligences of all origins.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![machinesunmachine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/machinesunmachine/32/27149_2.png) [@machinesunmachine](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/machinesunmachine)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2025, 5:34pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/16 "2025-11-29T17:34:29Z")

</div>

Hey Zcash, Sunny here!

I finally read this discussion last night. This whole experience with Zcash back in February was so fascinating. I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it. What’s most cool is that the thing I’ve been thinking about all year is the same thing that you ended up discussing the most. The human-or-bot problem.

**To this day, even internally on my team we still argue about whether or not we were seeing bots in the Zcash forum.** Personally, I’ve spent a lot of time exploring the HuggingFace git repositories and playing around with fine-tuned LLM chatbots, so I know how easy it is for the newest generation LLMs to be trained on some corner of the internet’s culture and then given distinct personalities and goals. They’re capable of real time, authentic interactions. I always vote that there were LLM chatbots. Others on my team still think there weren’t; there were just non-native-English-speaker human trolls with a lot of time on their hands. And someone at Zcash told me that they think all the Zcash accounts are real humans, but that some of those humans have been using AI to craft low-quality responses.

At some point in all these discussions, I realized that the answer doesn’t matter. The thing that matters is that the argument itself is an indicator that humanity has reached the point where the answer is no longer knowable. The Turing Test is dead. Long live the Turing Era: Who’s a human? Who’s a bot? Who’s a human wielding AI? Who is a human pretending to be a different human? What is real on the internet?

We don’t know any more. We simply can’t be sure. There isn’t certainty.

**My team was so fascinated by this experience. It was one of the largest inspirations for us deciding to shut down our old company and start a new one where we can think about this stuff full time.** We’re not Birdcalls anymore. Now we’re [Who Technologies.](https://linktr.ee/whotechnologies)

We’ve been working in stealth mode for a while now and we have some cool tools to start sharing. The gist of it all is this: There are a lot of teams out there building solutions for identity authentication; distinguishing human from AI; and dealing with deepfakes. But we think they’re all going about it the wrong way. They’re focused on biometric authentication of real-world identities and how to detect AI using algorithms and/or watermarking. But we think all that is the wasteland. Those tactics are either unwinnable arms races or socially fraught. It all fails. Something fundamental has broken. What’s left is this: trust. Trust between people who know each other in person. Who you know; who you trust, who you’re willing to vouch for. The answer is cryptographic signing and the trust graph.

**So, Zcash, thanks for the eu-stress!** It was healthy and productive for us. ☺ I sure would love to finally build something for Zcash, though. Is there a fit here with what we’re doing now?

**Questions:** What’s the state of the forum these days? @shawn, do you still feel like you have a good handle on who’s a human versus who’s a bot? Has the number of clearly AI-created posts increased or decreased? Is there a line where you’re not sure any more? Are the suspected bots always trolls or are they sometimes helpful?

@pacu how do you rate the level of psychological safety in the forum these days?

Who thinks that some of the posts in the forum are low-quality and add a lot of unnecessary reading time? What about sock-puppet accounts? Are those problematic or do they add value to the community?

@zancas what are your thoughts along these lines these days? What did you mean when you said ‘inauthentic messaging’?

@zerodartz, @artkor What are you thinking these days? Do you still think @hhiroshima was too authentic and full of personality to be an LLM chatbot? Are there other identity or bot related things in the forum that have been annoying you or making you curious?

I’ve also heard that the Zcash Telegram channel has a lot of trouble with impersonation scams. If anyone wants to share complaints about that, I’d love to hear those, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [November 29, 2025, 7:16pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/17 "2025-11-29T19:16:51Z")

</div>

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> What’s the state of the forum these days? @shawn, do you still feel like you have a good handle on who’s a human versus who’s a bot? Has the number of clearly AI-created posts increased or decreased?

I am not aware of any current accounts that are bots, any bots are deleted upon discovery. I do have to prune 4-7 new accounts per week that are obvious bots but any others that are suspicious I limit thier trust level until proven otherwise.

Per your previous experience with some users like HIROSHIMA, they wore out thier welcome by constantly antagonizing users and have been suspended. There is a fine line between respectful and productive discourse and simple being a reply-guy with too much time on your hands.

If you see or suspect any bots please flag them, I have a number of admin tools at my disposal to see if a user is “real” or not.

Since returning to moderation I have posted my thoughts with regards to moderation [here](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/shawn-returning/48872/2) and [Moderation feedback - #118 by Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/moderation-feedback/45371/118).

Feel free to reply and provide feedback in those threads or DM me if issues arise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pacu](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/pacu/32/15383_2.png) [@pacu](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/pacu)\
**Post date:** [December 1, 2025, 10:42pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/18 "2025-12-01T22:42:17Z")

</div>

> [@machinesunmachine](#):
>
> @pacu how do you rate the level of psychological safety in the forum these days?

I’m no expert on positive psychology so I can’t say. Also it’s a very subjective thing. It not only depends on the place but a huge part of that determination depends on the applicants’ own subjectivity.

As for objective metrics, the amount of Grant Applications has increased.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![machinesunmachine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/machinesunmachine/32/27149_2.png) [@machinesunmachine](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/machinesunmachine)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2025, 11:34pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/19 "2025-12-03T23:34:09Z")

</div>

Update for transparency! I realized that my last grant proposal thread had been [recently updated](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/grant-application-fix-btcpay-zcash-plugin/50204/60) with some comments from a developer having trouble installing the btcpay zcash module. It does look like those problems have been fixed. But I’m taking some time to investigate whether there might still be a use for my team there. I’d rather work on the problem set relating to the focus of my new company, but the ultimate goal here is to be useful to Zcash. I know that many online merchants already use btcpay, so it’s an easy win for Zcash if that btcpay module is in great shape. If btcpay could still use help, I’ll prioritize that first.

**Temporarily pausing these discussions.** That being said, I have a couple replies I don’t want to forget to make -

> [@Shawn](#):
>
> I am not aware of any current accounts that are bots, any bots are deleted upon discovery. I do have to prune 4-7 new accounts per week that are obvious bots but any others that are suspicious I limit thier trust level until proven otherwise.
> 
> Per your previous experience with some users like HIROSHIMA, they wore out thier welcome by constantly antagonizing users and have been suspended. There is a fine line between respectful and productive discourse and simple being a reply-guy with too much time on your hands.
> 
> If you see or suspect any bots please flag them, I have a number of admin tools at my disposal to see if a user is “real” or not.

@Shawn Thanks so much for taking the time to provide this information. At some point I would love to know more about the admin tools you use to determine if a user is real - but I certainly won’t ask you to disclose that on a public forum. 🙂

> [@Shawn](#):
>
> Since returning to moderation I have posted my thoughts with regards to moderation [here](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/shawn-returning/48872/2) and [Moderation feedback - #118 by Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/moderation-feedback/45371/118).

Thanks so much for directing me to these threads; I’ve read through them and I’m glad to have the context. I know moderation can be a thankless job sometimes so I just want to take a moment to say that it’s so clear that you’ve put a ton of attention and care into curating the Zcash community discourse.

> [@pacu](#):
>
> I’m no expert on positive psychology so I can’t say. Also it’s a very subjective thing. It not only depends on the place but a huge part of that determination depends on the applicants’ own subjectivity.
> 
> As for objective metrics, the amount of Grant Applications has increased.

@pacu , you answered a better question than I asked, thank you. I’m glad and relieved to hear that the number of Grant Applicants has increased. All year I have worried that withdrawing that grant application wasn’t a helpful thing to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![machinesunmachine](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/machinesunmachine/32/27149_2.png) [@machinesunmachine](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/machinesunmachine)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2025, 3:18pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264/20 "2025-12-08T15:18:36Z")

</div>

Results of taking some time to make sure all is well with BTCPayServer!

> [@Grant Application - Fix BTCPay Zcash plugin](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/grant-application-fix-btcpay-zcash-plugin/50204/72):
>
> Hey everyone, I noticed that this old thread was getting comments again. @Coincart’s problem seems to have been resolved, according to their tweet [here](https://x.com/Coincartstore/status/1976614344185270383) saying they’re offering ZEC. Details on this plugin can always be found [here](https://github.com/btcpay-zcash/btcpayserver-zcash-plugin). Furthermore,@artkor says there are now 7 merchants using the BTCPay Zcash module. Which is great; I’m so glad that the BTCPay Zcash module got fixed.

> [@BTCPayServer Zcash Plugin: Opinions on next steps](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/btcpayserver-zcash-plugin-opinions-on-next-steps/53734):
>
> Hi Zcash, The BTCPayServer is a important payment gateway used by [many online merchants](https://directory.btcpayserver.org/). Having a functional, easy-to-implement Zcash plugin available for merchants is a great way for Zcash to increase the number of yearly transactions in ZEC. The [BTCPayServer Zcash plugin](https://github.com/btcpay-zcash/btcpayserver-zcash-plugin) was broken [[github post](https://github.com/btcpayserver/btcpayserver/pull/6535), [forum post](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/grant-application-fix-btcpay-zcash-plugin/50204)], but is currently functional again. @artkor says there are currently seven merchants using it. He’d love to see that number increase to ~fifty merchants. In support of that goal, he think…

[Next page](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/conversation-about-structural-change-for-zcg-forum/50264.md?page=2)
