Actually i personally got aware due the Britich conversvatives leader election of an really interesting election proecess that seems quiete fair.
From all members, in our case, proposals, in each round the proposal with least support gets eliminated until only 2 members (2 proposals) are left for voting. If i remember right until the final voting or ballots as it’s named there a limited panel votes (could be in our case again some kind of governance panel) and in the final round the wide party members vote (could be in our case the whole community).
I think this design of voting has several advantages compared to a direct voting on several proposals at once.
Easy example would be there is 1 proposal of NO-Funding but there are 10 different about continued fundings but with different percentages for example, different recepients and so on. In a single round the “continue-funding” supports would split all their votes on 10 proposals which could lead to making the no-funding proposal the winning one.
Example 2: IF in each round the proposal with least support gets eliminated somone can truely say that the best 2 and 2 most supported made it to the final.
I think these are very important points to have in mind when choosing a voting system, be it for several candidates or propols if the answer is not limited to YES/NO…