# Double-Blind Grant Review

**URL:** <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/double-blind-grant-review/37600>\
**Category:** Community Grants\
**Created:** [October 19, 2020, 2:43am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/double-blind-grant-review/37600 "2020-10-19T02:43:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jmsjsph](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/jmsjsph/32/16507_2.png) [@jmsjsph](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/jmsjsph)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2020, 7:43am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/double-blind-grant-review/37600/3 "2020-11-02T07:43:30Z")

</div>

I kindly request an official response from the [@ZcashGrants](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/groups/zcashgrants) at their earliest convenience -

Is my Double-Blind Grant Review proposal an effective and viable method to welcoming more grants and reviewing them without biases?

It appears as if the MGRC is operating as if there are cost constraints despite that fact that millions, perhaps billions, will be available to administer grants, including to build the grant platform, itself.

Therefore, it may be prudent to consider a new tooling that enables anonymity, with or without shielded memos.

> [@MGRC Update 10-15-2020 and Meeting Minutes](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/mgrc-update-10-15-2020-and-meeting-minutes/37582/1):
>
> Decided that, before committing to using it, the MGRC should compare it with other, potentially cheaper and lower maintenance options (e.g. Google Forms combined with Zcash Forum, Github, or other freely available platforms).

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/double-blind-grant-review/37600)._