# ECC Mobile Wallet

**URL:** <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/ecc-mobile-wallet/36685>\
**Category:** Technology\
**Created:** [June 13, 2020, 2:04pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/ecc-mobile-wallet/36685 "2020-06-13T14:04:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shawn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shawn/32/187_2.png) [@Shawn](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/Shawn)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2020, 10:41pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/ecc-mobile-wallet/36685/6 "2020-06-12T22:41:18Z")

</div>

> [@Leap frogging zaddr](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/leap-frogging-zaddr/36550/44):
>
> So if we care about growing the privacy protections and all the other beneficial network effects of fully shielded Zcash, we should be laser focused on growing fully shielded z2z transactions and fully shielded ZEC.

There does seem to be a bit of a disconnect for what the ECC is publishing and what the end-user needs begin the migration to Z-addresses.

For example: I am super stoked that the ECC mobile wallet supports z2z (and it’s beautiful!) but why not also T-Z or Z-T? The Zcash user needs T-addresses to interact with 95% of the Zcash ecosystem for the foreseeable future, and it would be nice if there was something as polished as the ECC wallet code that could do it.

Is T support in the future plans for the rockstar ECC mobile wallet team?

**Updated**

**Hang on, It looks like I’m off base on this one** , you can in fact send Z-T in the ECC mobile wallet!

 ![Screenshot_20200613-093802](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/original/3X/c/f/cf4dda7f8ad052dea2112a24d2c90081975e914e.jpeg)

So that’s 50% of what I was hoping for…

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/ecc-mobile-wallet/36685)._