Thank you for describing everything as it is, here everyone is tired of explaining that what ECC does is not everyone wants it, while shifting adoption work to the community is not an option at all, then apparently, if the community wants to develop a coin and improve the code, it should do it yourself 
It is because of this approach, for example, it seems to me that if funding is supported, nothing will change, the next 4 years will be spent on scaling development, and the current promotion work is not needed because there will be a new code and new adoption work, because compatibility with it won’t be old and the agreements also need to be re-formed, but it only seems to me, I don’t know for everyone.