Looking for public opinion on one idea I have:
Finance courses for under-privileged teens and young adults in Indonesia. Think https://electriccoin.co/crypto-in-context/ but with those who has dropped out of school but now trying to finish their high school diploma. Will probably be focused on personal finance with some intro contents to Zcash.
Based on napkin math, I believe this will be $5000 max with 4 or 5 sessions as deliverables. Initial target is 10 students aged between 15 to 25. Confident we can attract 20 students if we can provide $20 stipend per class for each student, covering their transport and lunch.
I promise I will act on this idea if this post gets more than 10 likes before next weekend (until March 3rd 2023).
Edit: as promised I have submitted a proposal based on this idea for the minor grants
Great concept, Cheers Zcash Foundation
Absolutely worth, also as a pilot for other similar grants.
This is awesomely awesome
Thank you for your excellent initiatives, but no offense, I am sad to see how inefficiently we continue to spend the funds, given the current coin prices. We are firing a cannon at sparrows.
I really appreciate everyone’s contribution, but the narrative “we have money for development” is melting at 10% a day. And we ourselves push prices into the abyss when we lay down expenses requiring the sale of ZEC for dollars.
Maybe just buy an advertising budget from Google to show this video to an unlimited number of people? In my opinion, this is much more effective, based on the number of people who would know about cash for $1 spent.
People who invest their finances in the purchase of ZEC are very upset about the current situation in the market and some grants looks like they are just donating money.
PS As an ambassador, I haven’t sold a single coin in a year of work, because I have other incomes and can afford it. So that you understand how much I doubt the need for budgeting projects at current prices, I wrote this question:
Let’s discuss this. ZEC is not a cash cow.
UPD Correction, when I wrote “we continue to spend inefficiently”, it does not mean that the accepted grants are not effective. I don’t think so at all. I mean precisely the inefficiency of converting ZEC into dollars at current prices.
Did the deadline get extended? I could have sworn I read that somewhere just yesterday maybe
I second this point! Regardless of the presumed short- and long-term value of a proposed project, we’ve also got to be highly disciplined and respectful to where ZEC is valued by the market, and how much fiscal irresponsibility we are undertaking by releasing community ZEC at depressed market rates.
An interesting thought experiment would be to whiteboard an idea about a ZCG community funds auto-furlough, where for example, under any market conditions where ZEC are market trading at 30% or more beneath the weekly 200 moving average, then all grants approvals and ZEC spend are suspended until the ZEC valuation returns.
For the current outlay, ZEC has a weekly 200 moving average at approximately $90 and 30% less would be $60. By the logic of an auto-furlough policy, the ZCG will place any new grant approval and spending on hold until ZEC have regained $60 per coin of value.
The exact measures and static numbers should be debated. Using 50% as a second example, the auto-furlough level would be around $45.00 per coin.
I do not know which option would be correct. But it looks like a financial protocol. Any structure that has a budget must have a financial protocol, otherwise it is our common naive irresponsibility.
today is the day, 3rd april when the list of projects get published. if you could share the link here seeing the list that would great. let the best win
We have published the list of grant applications that will be submitted to ZCAP for approval:
- Algorithmic Anthropometry
- Aprendamos de Criptos y Blockchain (trans. Let’s learn about Crypto and Blockchain)
- Crew3 technician
- Dizzy Wallet: A Dedicated Zcash Wallet for Discord
- Preparing and publishing a web novel dealing with financial privacy in crypto
- Research on Zcash’s KYC-Free Infrastructure
- Uang di Masa Depan: A Personal Finance Course for Under-privileged Youth
- Unified Address parsing and construction library for .NET
- Zcash Zeitgeist 02
- Zcast, el podcast de Zcash en Español
The ZCAP poll will open later today, and will close at 09:00 UTC on 17th April 2023.
Great to see those proposals, and I liked the format/layout, very neat to read!
Will there be another batch for more people to create proposals for Minor Grants?
Great @Dodger , thanks for the swift reply.
kindly let me know where to find the poll. cheers
@Dodger or is it the numbers next to the title?
The numbers near the links are just a counter how many times the link has been clicked.
Good luck to everyone!
Great news! Good look to all the zcashers!
Dear Community and Voting Members,
to support my application, kindly see the updated Minor Grant Proposal - Tilmar Goos
Sneak Peak on my written research The Data Dilemma and its Relevance in Human Science
I voluntarily Chair the Working Group Education of the Crypto Valley Association and initiated in 2022 a Call For Paper on “Opportunities and Challenges: The Future of DeFi in Traditional Finance”. Here you can find the resulting Research Journal 2022. In April 2023, I will announce the theme of this years CVA Research Journal.
I was invited to the Podcast Swiss Road to Crypto to speak about my concept of Algorithmic Anthropometry
Finally, here a glance of the various sources I use (non-exhaustive list)
Amoore, L. (2011). Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 24–43.
Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Didenko, A. (2020). After Libra, Digital Yuan and COVID-19: Central Bank Digital Currencies and the New World of Money and Payment Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Asaolu, O.s. (2006). On the Emergence of New Computer Technologies…Educational Technology & Society. 9. 335-343.
Bach, D., Newman, A. L., & Weber, S. (2006). The International Implications of China’s Fledgling Regulatory State: From Product Maker to Rule Maker. New Political Economy, 11(4), 499–518.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87–99.
Becerril, A. (2018). The value of our personal data in the Big Data and the Internet of all Things Era. ADCAIJ: ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL. 7. 71. 10.14201/ADCAIJ2018727180.
Bentham. (1838). Principle of Penal Law. In Works of Jeremy Bentham (p. part 3, chap. 12, problem 9, 557). William Tate.
Boshkov, T. (2019). Blockchain and Digital Currency in the World of Finance. In A. Salman & M. G. Abdul Razzaq (Eds.), Blockchain and Cryptocurrencies. IntechOpen.
Breckenridge, K. D., Szreter, S., & British Academy (Eds.). (2012). Registration and recognition: Documenting the person in world history. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Brey, P. (2018). The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society, 52, 39–45.
Caplan, J., & Torpey, J. (Eds.). (2001). Documenting individual identity: The development of state practices in the modern world. Princeton University Press.
Clegg, S., & Haugaard, M. (Eds.). (2009). Introduction: Why Power is the Central Concept of the Social Sciences. In The SAGE handbook of power (pp. 1–25). SAGE.
Cohen, B. J. (1977). Hegemony. In B. J. Cohen (Ed.), Organizing the world’s money. London: Palgrave Macmillan
Coleman, M., & Grove, K. (2009). Biopolitics, Biopower, and the Return of Sovereignty. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27(3), 489–507.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society.
Denbow, J. M. (2018). The Economization of Life. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(1), 264–269.
Dennehy, D., & Sammon, D. (2015). Trends in mobile payments research: A literature review. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(1), 49-61.
Dowding, K. (2012). Why should we care about the definition of power? Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 119–135.
Ehler. (1912). The Legal Importance of Birth Registration. Transactions of the Third Annual Meeting, American Association for the Study and Prevention of Infant Mortality, 102–108.
Enders, Tobias. (2018). Exploring the Value of Data – a Research Agenda.
Engert, W. and Fung, B. (2017) Central Bank Digital Currency: Motivations and Implications. Bank of Canada Discussion Paper 2017-16.
Escobar, A. (1984). Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 10(3), 377–400.
Ethel M. Watters. (1924). Child Health Magazin. In Democracy and the Individual: Maternity and Child Welfare in the United States (Vol. 5).
Farrel, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019b). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019a). Of Privacy and Power: The Transatlantic Struggle over Freedom and Security. Princeton University Press.
Fichte, J. G., Neuhouser, F., & Baur, M. (2000). Foundations of natural right: According to the principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. 1: An introduction. Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (2001c). Truth and Juridical Forms. (Edited by J. F. Faubion). The Essential Works of Foucault III, 1954-1984: Power. London: Allen Lane, 1-89
Frei, C., & Huang, Q. (2020). Traditional and Digital Currencies in Over-the-Counter Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: An elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753.
Gürkan, C. (2018). Foucault, Publıc Fınance And Neolıberal Governmentalıty A Crıtıcal Socıologıcal Analysıs. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi.
Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. Verso.
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, D., Walker, J., et al. (2011). Fundamentals of physics. 77–9311/21/21 4:19:00 PM
Harcourt, B. E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. University of Chicago Press.
Headrick, D. R. (2000). When information came of age: Technologies of knowledge in the age of reason and revolution, 1700 - 1850. Oxford Univ. Press.
Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kadriu, “Discovering value in academic social networks: A case study in ResearchGate,” Proceedings of the ITI 2013 35th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, Cavtat, 2013, pp. 57-62,
Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Koopman, C. (2019a). How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. The University of Chicago Press.
Koopman, C. (2019b). “Information before Information Theory,” 11.
Koopman, C., & Matza, T. (2013). Putting Foucault to Work: Analytic and Concept in Foucaultian Inquiry. Critical Inquiry, 39(4), 817–840.
Korpi, W. (1985). Power Resources Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 31.
Kumar, D & Duvvuri, Duvvuri B K Kamesh & Umar, Syed. (2014). A Study on Big Data and its Importance. 9. 973-4562.
Larue, L., Fontan, C., & Sandberg, J. (2020). The promises and perils of central bank digital currencies. Revue de La Régulation, 28.
Lemoine, B. (2020). State Sovereignty as a Machine of Domination Against Society—Pierre
Dardot and Christian Laval, Dominer. Enquête sur la souveraineté de l’État en Occident (Paris, La Découverte, 2020, 736 p.). European Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 465–474.
Lipson, Howard. (2003). Tracking and Tracing Cyber-Attacks: Technical Challenges and Global Policy.
Lukes, S. (2004). Introduction. In Power: A radical view (2nd ed, pp. 1–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
Manokha, I. (2018). Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 219–237.
Mathew, D. (2019). Surveillance Society: Panopticon in the Age of Digital Media.
Mauro, A. D., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). What is Big Data? A Consensual Definition and a Review of Key Research Topics.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Noiriel, G. (2002). 2. The Identification of the Citizen: The Birth of Republican Civil Status in France. In J. Caplan & J. Torpey (Eds.), Documenting Individual Identity (pp. 28–48). Princeton University Press.
Norrlof, C. (2014). Dollar hegemony: A power analysis. Review of International Political
Economy, 21(5), 1042–1070.
Oates, W. E. (1968). The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal System. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1(1), 37.
Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2018). A networked self and human augmentics, artificial intelligence, sentience. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Rabinow, P. (2008). Marking time: On the anthropology of the contemporary. Princeton University Press.
Rai, Neelabh. (2012). Tracking Digital Footprints of Scareware to Thwart Cyber Hypnotism Through Cyber Vigilantism in Cyberspace. BVICAM’s International Journal of Information Technology 0973 - 5658. 4. 0973-5658.
Reigeluth, T. B. (2014). Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 243–254.
Riahi, S., & Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of ChouaibDoukkali Jabran Khalil Jabran Avenu, El jadida 24000, Morocco. (2018). Big Data and Big Data Analytics: Concepts, types and technologies. International Journal of Research and Engineering, 5(9), 524–528.
Rose, C. (2015). The Evolution Of Digital Currencies: Bitcoin, A Cryptocurrency Causing A Monetary Revolution. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 14(4), 617. The Evolution Of Digital Currencies: Bitcoin, A Cryptocurrency Causing A Monetary Revolution | International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER)
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380.
Schüll, N. D. (2016). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11(3), 317–333.
Schüritz, Ronny & Seebacher, Stefan & Dorner, Rebecca. (2017). Capturing Value from Data: Revenue Models for Data-Driven Services. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.648.
Scott, A., Nash, K., & Smith, A. M. (2016). New critical writings in political sociology. Routledge.
Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed (Veritas paperback edition). Yale University Press.
Seele, P. (2016). Envisioning the digital sustainability panopticon: A thought experiment of how big data may help advancing sustainability in the digital age. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 845–854.
Stone, C. (2006). Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (December): 947–52. Cited 543 times. American Political Science
Tatham, M. and Bauer, M.W. (2014) ‘Competence ring-fencing from below? The drivers of regional demands for control over upwards dispersion’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(9): 1367 –85.
Taylor-Sakyi, Kevin. (2016). Big Data: Understanding Big Data.
Thompson, V. A. (1974). The Politics of Truth. By Holton P. Odegard. (University: The University of Alabama Press, 1971. Pp. xi, 439. $13.50.). American Political Science Review, 68(4), 1742–1743.
Türken, S., Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., & Roen, K. (2016). Making Sense of Neoliberal Subjectivity: A Discourse Analysis of Media Language on Self-development. Globalizations, 13(1), 32–46.
Vargas, M. H., & Roldán Restrepo, D. (2019). The instruments of public policy. A transdisciplinary look. Cuadernos de Administración, 35(63), 101–113.
Weber, I., & Staples, M. (2021). Programmable Money: Next-generation Conditional Payments using Blockchain: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science, 7–14.
Weber, M., Roth, G., & Wittich, C. (2013). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Vol. 2: … (Nachdr.). Univ. of California Press.
Westermeier, C. (2020). Money is data – the platformization of financial transactions. Information, Communication & Society, 23(14), 2047–2063.
Wilbur. (1897). How the establishment of a permanent census bureau will improve the vital statistics of the United States. Chicago: American Medical Association Press.