# Major Grants Review Committee Candidates MEGATHREAD

**URL:** https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/major-grants-review-committee-candidates-megathread/36472
**Category:** Governance
**Created:** [May 10, 2020, 7:33pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/major-grants-review-committee-candidates-megathread/36472 "2020-05-10T19:33:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 218

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![zancas](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/zancas/32/42011_2.png) [@zancas](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/zancas)
#### Post date: [August 19, 2020, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/major-grants-review-committee-candidates-megathread/36472/218 "2020-08-19T16:29:32Z")

</div>

I am using this message to register my opposition to the 1-year term limits for MGRC seats.

In the course of fulfilling my due diligence obligations as a Voter, I’ve come to the following conclusion.

Holding elections every year is too expensive.

Voters will either fail to fulfill their due-diligence obligations, or they will have to forgo significant other opportunities.

Moreover single year terms is a premature optimization. It’s likely (given the current slate of candidates) that the MGRC members will be individually spectacular, and well constrained by their peers with respect to error/malfeasance etc.

Finally, the opportunity cost reasoning will apply multiplicatively to candidates. This is counter to the efficient function of the MGRC. It’s a bad idea. One year terms are too short.

I want to know how to fix this obvious bug.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/major-grants-review-committee-candidates-megathread/36472)._