We do have on linkedin thats a medium , here no body users , then we work with top agencies in Latam and Paris brining tons of influencers on board.
No proofs were verified and double checked from your end, and over that a ban ?
That’s not decentralization that’s control and rectified ownership by privacy advocates ?
ZCG did zero research , no one asked for our govt letter , no one asked for our funding , legal side ?
No one asked to verify waiting list , No , decision was made without making any public comment
Why when it’s already mentioned we have used or promoted or have any accounts in other social , it’s clearly not our twitter and telegram.
So can you explain how was the due diligence done , the platform as total registered over 200k users but its a very little amount of users daily since its not an app , 200-500 signups , many use the messaging , some use the echo , and some streaming who wants to bring there followers
So the idea is to build a decentralized platform not as here where ban or IP tracking is public
You should check the reward side how users claim its only with posts and interactions and automatically a profile and likes add on rewards
No information was verified was asked and why is all the Grant members have a donate button on there private websites or aren’t they well kept ? They still depend upon commission from approved projects and donations ?
I have seen many projects approved grant then went rogue , but have you checked the real identity team behind it , spoke with the team or founders , no you just approve for projects who doesn’t have a name keep taking Zcash money then disappeared.
Plus this idea on social network on Zcash will be one of one and with your support this would have bought it mainstream , not just the money the community would have been great
Or are you guys afraid that would kill the forum and people will follow the social network path which is more interesting ?