# NU7 Sentiment Polling: Questions for Community Review & Coinholder Voting via Zodl

**URL:** <https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/nu7-sentiment-polling-questions-for-community-review-coinholder-voting-via-zodl/55713>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [May 15, 2026, 11:54pm UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/nu7-sentiment-polling-questions-for-community-review-coinholder-voting-via-zodl/55713 "2026-05-15T23:54:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 55

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shielded-nate](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/zcash/user_avatar/forum.zcashcommunity.com/shielded-nate/32/33294_2.png) [@shielded-nate](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/u/shielded-nate)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2026, 1:25am UTC](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/nu7-sentiment-polling-questions-for-community-review-coinholder-voting-via-zodl/55713/55 "2026-05-27T01:25:09Z")

</div>

I realize I’m late with this request, but I propose changing the text of Question 5, Benefits, first bullet from:

> - Confirmation latency drops ~3× (from 75 s to 25 s average for first confirmation))

-to:

> - Gives users the option of ~3× faster confirmations (from 75 s to 25 s average for initial block confirmations) with a corresponding reduction of protection against rollbacks (from 75s of mining effort to 25s).

Lower latency for confirmation is a trade-off against rollback security, and a trade-off itself isn’t a pure benefit. The benefit is the choice it gives to users between the trade-off. IMO, it’s important to make trade-offs clear for anyone casting votes.

See [my post on the shorter block time proposal](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/proposal-lower-zcash-block-target-spacing-to-25s/54577/16) for more detail.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.zcashcommunity.com/t/nu7-sentiment-polling-questions-for-community-review-coinholder-voting-via-zodl/55713)._