Placeholder Considerations: Resources, Governance, and Legitimacy in NU4

[str4d]

@"boxalex

@cburniske

For legal reasons the ZF does not want sole discretion over the movement of the network’s funds, therefore it has to at least be a two signature situation.

I didn’t read such statement yet, even more suprising not in my own proposal which has the foundation as the whole recepient of a new dev fee. IF this is true than:
1.) At least this should have mentioned allready in my proposal which favours the Foundation as the recepient.
2.) Some people know way more than the forum community.

Here’s a link to the statement, which was made directly to the forum community:

The future of Zcash in the year 2020

Thanks for tagging me @sonya; yes, I think any proposal that has the Foundation receiving all funds (even if there are contracts in place for development) could jeopardize broader decentralization, and as you suggested I wouldn’t want the Foundation to be a single gatekeeper. And thanks to @zooko for his post above and giving the community his perspective. The Foundation would only support proposals that: a) don’t rely on the Foundation being a single gatekeeper of funds b) don’t change the u…