Sorry Im British English. These words in this order make no sense to me in a democratic vote.
Specifically what does “out of step with best practices mean” - Which? can I have a look at a copy?
I disagree with the rest of your post, but this is nothing to do with me. I just want to know what “gender best practices are” and how they intersect with democracy.
wrong thread?
Geezz… @dontbeevil your right, here’s a new topic:
You’re right @dontbeevil that post shouldn’t be here! @zancas would you please delete your mispost?
Interesting how you both joined the forum on January 15th, but also have deep insight the history of the “toxic culture” that @zebambam helped to create.
Also interesting how you have a nym that is an imperative about what people should do, and you manage to bring up “ECC leaders” in a thread about the ZOMG…
I wonder which other nyms on this forum can be frequently associated with the phrase “ECC leader”? @Shawn @decentralistdan ? How about nyms less than two months old? Is there a really glaringly obvious pattern here?
may be they are influenced by my handle dont-be-evil? That’s the nature of pseudonyms, you sum up your core belief into your handle. Decide & judge based on the content, not based on their handle. Like I said, it’s not clear if these voices are being heard or making any difference. If they get that feeling of being heard then they probably would stop making the same point in different contexts while being relevant.
What a strange and unfortunate series of events which seem to have unfolded. It does seem to highlight the oversight of succession planning in the election process and the real lose is to the community and projects. I wish Sara the best in here future endeavors and the community a quick resolution to the committee staffing so they can get back to the people business
Aw, thanks. 
That means a lot, and I really like your contributions here too.
Please don’t worry. We’re all very committed to not losing any momentum, and were already operating very nimbly. I don’t think this would have disrupted our grantmaking even if it had dragged out.
The trickiest thing for the ZOMG itself is probably the problem we started with: figuring out the right way to fund Zecwallet and other future grantees. But I think/hope we were already on a path to figure that out before Sarah’s departure, and that while Sarah leaving is a huge loss, we still have a good chance of figuring it out.
Here’s how I think they’d intersect, ideally: a majority of ZCAP would observe (in Zcash ecosystem or in broader life / politics / etc) that diverse groups have advantages over non-diverse groups and vote for a diverse group.
The system of voting we have right now makes it impossible to do this without giving up the ability to express a preference about many candidates, but staggered voting, or “vote for your ideal committee” would make it possible.
I strongly disagree with this stance. Inclusion is the only way do diversity. but as not to derail this thread. we can continue this through pm. (you cant vote for people that dont stand and voting for someone because of arbitrary characteristics is not something I am comfortable with)
sorry to hear you’re leaving. your contributions were appreciated 
This kind of talk is the reason why Zcash is the laughing stock in the crypto world. This thread only suppressed the price for the last 2 weeks, especially with the later conversation. You figure it out what i mean and why that is. And yes, i did joined just to write this because this entire thing is infuriating. Welcome to the real world people!
What leader at ECC are you referring to?