I don’t understand this argument. This proposals calls for
“outside development fee” [to] development teams, chosen semi-annually by the Foundation
How is this any more enticing, or any different, than the same team getting funded to do the same work with the same amount of effort and uncertainty, by sequence of “one-off grants” of the same ZEC amount? In both cases, the teams have to show up every 6 months with plans justifying the continued receipt of funds. Which sounds good to me! Do we want something else?