It makes me think: How can we make the Zcash blockchain and the Zcash coins be part of the future governance protocol a hundred years from now?
It also makes me think: what if I were talking to an “immutabilist” who thought that the consensus rules should never be changed after a coin launched? But I thought that new ideas learned after the initial launch of the coin should be used. Then I might say to that person, Okay, the consensus rules of the original coin are immutable. But, after four years, let’s make a new coin with mostly the same rules as the original coin, but some differences, and let’s begin its life by airdropping the new coin to the owners of the previous coin. And then we could do this every four years, integrating new ideas that we’ve learned since the last time.
Good governance can only come from the self-governed, maybe a reason why the world’s in the state that it is! The idea of good governance coming from a group largely comprised of anarchist seems slightly oxymoronic. Once Zcash community members realize that there personal decisions to make the right choice carries more weight than they think, then they’ll be in a better position to make governing decisions that affect the rest of the community’s future. That comes with maturity, with time. You can’t fake it and you can only speed it up so much.
A decade sounds right. The slow way is the safe way. (Sorry no real help)
re: Apparent conflict of anarchy and governance - I had the same issue when I was introduced to Dash, which has its own solution to governance that results in achieving comparatively rapid consensus. What I came to realise is that there’s a subtle but significant difference between government and governance - that being the lack of coercion.
What’s more, being that this is all open source, it doesn’t even take an almost-majority to split off and do their own thing - even a single individual can fork the code and / or even the blockchain and go their own way to crypto utopia.
So, as small as that lack of coercion difference might be, it creates a night and day difference between government (do as we say or else) and governance (consensus decision making with no penalty for disassociation).
@zooko “Okay, the consensus rules of the original coin are immutable. But, after four years, let’s make a new coin“
believe the original zcash should be treated as money. think it might be cool to eventually have a new coin that’s more like a currency. be really neat if one day we could have stable ZEC currency units