Hello Zcash community,
I’ve submitted a grant application to ZCG: ZPAD-20 — Open Asset Indexing & Discovery Infrastructure for Zcash ($24,000, ~4.5 months, solo developer). Posting it here for community input, and happy to answer any questions — including the hard ones.
Full application: Grant Application - ZPAD-20 — Open Asset Indexing & Discovery Infrastructure for Zcash · Issue #319 · ZcashCommunityGrants/zcashcommunitygrants · GitHub
One-liner: an open-source, deterministic indexer + conformance suite + public explorer/API that reconstructs application-asset state directly from the Zcash chain — same chain → same state, no trusted oracle — designed to carry over to native assets when ZSA (ZIP-226/227) ships.
Why this matters
Zcash has growing asset activity — ZRC-20 inscriptions (Zecscriptions, Zinc, Zerdinals) already exist — but there is no shared, conformance-tested indexing standard. Each project runs its own bespoke indexer, and no third party can independently prove any of them computed state correctly. Bitcoin has mature open indexer/explorer tooling for its meta-protocols; Zcash doesn’t yet have a verifiable equivalent. This gap widens with ZSA: native assets will need exactly the same indexing and discovery layer when NU7 lands.
What already exists (before any grant money)
The spec and a tested reference implementation are public and MIT-licensed — you can verify everything in five minutes:
- Operation codec, pure deterministic ledger, replay tooling
- Passing test suite including a reproducibility test (same op log → identical state)
- Zero-infrastructure demo:
npm test && npm run demo - A ZSA-compatibility document mapping every operation onto ZIP-226/227
- A backend already connected to a real Zcash testnet lightwalletd over gRPC
What the grant delivers (3 milestones, $7k each + $3k startup)
- M1 (Jul 2026): on-chain indexer streaming testnet blocks via zebrad/lightwalletd, transparent-carrier decoding, deterministic reorg handling, green CI.
- M2 (Sep 2026): published conformance test vectors so independent indexers can prove agreement; shielded-memo detection via viewing key; spec advanced to v1.0.
- M3 (Oct 2026): documented public read API + minimal hosted explorer (aggregates only — counts/concentration, never addresses); ZSA adapter (or tested stub + migration plan if NU7 isn’t on a test network); stretch: a ZRC-20 read adapter so existing inscription activity flows into the same verifiable op log.
Full transparency: ZecPad
I’m separately building ZecPad, a self-funded application that will use this standard — that’s where ZPAD-20 was extracted from. The boundary is explicit in the application: this grant funds only the open layer (spec, indexer, conformance vectors, API/explorer), all MIT and usable by anyone, including projects that compete with ZecPad. No grant funds flow to ZecPad, and application-level fees belong to the application layer, not the protocol or these deliverables. I’d rather over-disclose this relationship up front than have anyone discover it — ask me anything about it.
Relationship to existing inscription work
Not a competitor to ZRC-20/Zecscriptions/Zinc/Zerdinals. The engine is carrier-agnostic by design — it consumes an abstract op log — so reading ZRC-20 operations into the same verifiable state is a planned adapter. If anyone from those projects is reading: I’d genuinely welcome comparing notes on conformance vectors that cover both standards.
What I’d value feedback on
- Would existing indexer operators actually adopt or test against a shared conformance-vector suite?
- Reorg handling for meta-protocol state on Zcash — any patterns or war stories?
- Anything in the ZSA mapping (deploy → ZIP-227 issuance; buy/sell/transfer → ZIP-226 transfer/burn) that looks off to people closer to the NU7 work?
If approved, I’ll post monthly status updates in this thread. Thank you for your time.