Ahh… I was following @daira 's lead there.
I hear that is an objectionable association to you, and think that you’d never knowingly support something that could be accurately described as such.
Therefore I believe that there has been both a communication breakdown, which I believe must be laid at the feet of those with deep technical knowledge, and a betrayal of trust, which must be owned by QEDIT.
I won’t re-label the technology in a way that I feel is less accurate, but I want to be clear that I believe it’s critical to be aware of which actions were taken by whom.
@_jon characterizes this as a reasonable approach to a difficult problem. I disagree, but I am open to conversation.