The topic was your leadership of the Zcash Foundation. My comment was an example to ponder if leadership has had any change of opinions about how it could demonstrate full faith in Zcash’s ZEC.
I’ve recently re-run a community poll, 6-7 months after the original poll. And in the context of continued ZEC weakness, in the face of BTC/ ETH strength. It is reasonable to re-ask a question like that over 6+ month time period, because we’ve got to assume that reasonable people may have changing opinions in the context of changing external variables.
(Notice that community polling results have shifted much more closely to favoring a reallocation)
As @birdify thread ponders a new Foundation leader, my comment speculates that a new leader could give the community hope that the treasury would position out of BTC/ ETH, using those proceeds to alleviate the selling liquidation of our beloved ZEC asset.
I’m stumped that you couldn’t piece together how this logic flows.
Leadership is given in many different forms, sometimes speeches and other times by actions. Hedging out of BTC/ ETH, and into USD/ ZEC would be a leadership behavior to increase optics around faith in ZEC. (At the possible risk of missing out on additional BTC/ ETH rally gains)
Is it correct to assume that your position on Zcash Foundation treasury holdings is unchanged until otherwise noted (regardless of changing market valuations or any other external factors) ?
Exactly, my point of re-asking the question, is because market valuations of ZEC/ BTC/ ETH are radically different now than in Q1 of 2022!