I’m confused.
If ECC’s cryptography/protocol engineers do not have time to work on this cryptographic voting protocol (and are surprised it’s even invoked), the Director of Engineering hasn’t reviewed it either, and ECC’s CEO has refused to engage in a requisite technical discussion for nearly 2 years now…
Then who has analyzed this voting protocol and decided to encourage the community to use it, despite dire warnings from domain experts and others community members?
And who will analyze and act on the feedback within your 2-weeks window?
And whence this sudden sense of urgency to revive a protocol that’s widely considered problematic and dangerous, and invoke it on such short notice?