You act as if I’m wrong for pointing out Zooko stands to double his fees if we go two chains (ASIC/GPU). Then come out the next sentence and admit he will profit from two chains. I also pointed out those two chains would harm the revenue of GPU miners at the expense of Zooko receiving his DOUBLE FEE.
It’s quite simple to understand.
Here is the post I made for you to read again with an unbiased mind if you care to read it again:
Well, you currently have approximately 90% in favor of GPU’s and you appear to be standing up for the 8% who will NEVER grow to as high as GPU’s and the 2% who are undecided or don’t care.
WHY?
Do you not have an ECONOMIC INCENTIVE (Conflict of interest) with the potential for DOUBLE the Developer Fees?
The appearance of this isn’t good, Zooko. It’s just not, sir. YOUR OWN ECONOMIC INTEREST ARE ALSO AT PLAY HERE AREN"T THEY? Be honest now…
Your OWN economic interest is threatening those who have already invested tremendously for this project. I would have bought VEGA’s instead of NVIDIA’s to mine Monero instead of ZEC if I had known ZCash would not hold true to there declaration for ASIC-Resistance to the community. I believe MANY other GPU miners here would say the same.
While talking about others who have economic incentives to lobby one way or another, he (Zooko) also has his own economic incentive with double fees. Which would harm revenues of GPU miners to gratify his own “conflicted” interests economically.