Moving the Dev Fund discussion forward

[Dodger]

@joshs

@Dodger, will you respond to my question?

@joshs

I favor a dev fund, but only if it is non-direct / grants based. If we need more time to develop such a model, I would be ok extending the current fund for under a year, to minimize the impact to smaller grant recipients. I would not be in favor of a dev fund otherwise, except maybe a small amount for minor grants by an independent ZCG, which won’t be done by November.

How should I answer your survey to clearly and accurately reflect that preference?

A “non-direct / grants based” dev fund is outside the scope of this exploratory poll.

This poll is intended to explore community sentiment regarding what they would like to see happen in November. It’s not intended to solicit input on what should happen beyond that.

So, your answers should reflect what you want to see happen in November.

Assuming that the proposal you’ve put forward (Draft ZIP to modify ZIP 1014: Extending the Dev Fund by one year) is what you want to see happen, you should select the answers that most closely match that proposal, e.g.: Q1: Yes; Q2: No; Q3: 1 year; Q4: BP, ZCG, ZF.