Protocol "Convention" as a Finalization Step in Network Upgrades

[Shawn]

@Chewbacca

Why do I see it and you don’t? I don’t know, but like I said the disagreements are

I didn’t say we don’t understand the philosophical differences, those are plain to see in the “for” and “against” ZSA threads.

I simply don’t understand why so many are comfortable pointing to this coinholder polling as if it’s not greatly flawed in its current implementation. Sure, the results may align with your opinions but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try improve and make the system better.

@ZcashFoundation

This does not invalidate the coinholder results. Coinholders have legitimate standing in this process, and the mechanism was auditable and transparent. But it does mean that extreme results on low-participation questions should be understood as the strong views of a subset of participating coinholders, not a definitive verdict from all ZEC holders.

@aquietinvestor

The current coinholder polling mechanism is used by a relatively small number of large holders and does not fully represent coinholders as a whole.