A lot of the discussion so far has been based on the premise that, while the process for this coin-weighted poll may be deeply flawed, it will nonetheless tell us something about the positions of coin holders.
Well, no. I strongly dispute that we can have any confidence that the outcome will reflect the positions of coin holders. Partly this is because only a tiny fraction of coin-share is voting. By itself, that would render the result no more indicative than a lottery. But it’s actually worse: some of us, motivated by deep concern about the integrity of governance processes (*), have been actively telling people not to vote. The problem of poor turnout affects many elections, but is at least mitigated to some extent by all or most factions attempting to “get out the vote”. And here’s the kicker: in this poll, objections to use of poor-quality governance processes are very likely to be correlated with opinions about the substantive issues being voted on.
[Edit: (*) I do not mean to imply that others who disagree do not also have deep concern for the integrity of governance processes. I worded this poorly in my original comment.]