Hello Hanh,
Thank you for taking the time to respond.
First, we appreciate your technical contributions to Zcash. However, as you previously acknowledged, you did not have enough time to review all regional community reports in detail. We believe this is at the core of the issue.
You state again that we did not collaborate with ZecHub and did not publish Arabic content there.
First:
The agreement was to translate the articles and publish them in our Academy, not on ZecHub, We have evidence supporting this:
Second:
We also received a confirmation that we had completed the requested work. Unfortunately, we cannot publish that conversation without permission, we send it to you in PM, please check.
Third:
After our proposal was first rejected because we had not published the articles on ZecHub (even though this wasn’t a part of the original agreement), we immediately requested that the translated articles be published there as well. You can verify that here: Add Arabic Zcash articles by Cryptoblarabi · Pull Request #1673 · ZecHub/zechub · GitHub
…
Our intention is not to criticize anyone personally or create argument. We simply want the facts to be clear and to receive a fair evaluation based on what was actually agreed upon and delivered.
We hope this additional context helps clarify our position and that you will reconsider your assessment.