hey so i had this idea for a tool and i want to share it with you guys i would like you to check the technical parts and tell me if it makes sense or if im missing something important
where did this idea come from
so i tried to set up a zebra node and it was like 2+ hours fighting with dependency errors like libclang-dev and build-essential and port conflicts with docker and manual config files and creating separate users for security and all that stuff
now i have my node syncing but the process was way harder than it needed to be you know
i also developed a web to see zcash nodes and i noticed that there are a lot of outdated nodes out there probably because maintaining them is complicated or people just dont have time for that
so i was thinking what if there was something that simplifies all of this it would be really interesting to have a tool that makes this easier
The idea: ZNode Sentinel
a tool that makes it easier to run and maintain a zcash node
What it would do:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Web Dashboard | see node status without touching the terminal |
| One-Click Install | zebra + lightwalletd + monitoring pre-configured |
| Assisted Updates | notification + GPG verification + you confirm |
| Tor/I2P Integration | optional network privacy |
| Alerts | telegram/email if something fails |
| Security Sidecar | protection against node-specific attacks |
Why does this matter?
zcash doesnt have an equivalent to umbrel (bitcoin) or dappnode (ethereum):
| Feature | Umbrel | DAppNode | Zcash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web dashboard | Yes | Yes | No |
| One-click | Yes | Yes | No |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes | No |
| Light server integrated | Yes | N/A | No |
umbrel reached 90% market share in new lightning nodes so there is real demand for this kind of thing
zcash data:
- only 100-150 active nodes (vs 15000 for bitcoin)
- zcashd is deprecated in 2025 so there is urgency to migrate to zebra
- ZCG RFP 2022 asked for exactly this and nobody delivered
Proposed technical features
full stack in docker compose:
- zebra 3.0.0 (sync 35-40% faster around 15-16 hrs)
- lightwalletd for mobile wallets (zashi ywallet zingo)
- prometheus + grafana for metrics
- native health endpoints from zebra 3.0+
privacy integration:
- tor hidden services for anonymous p2p
- i2p support as alternative
- onlynet=onion + onlynet=i2p configuration
automatic hardening (with your approval):
- pre-configured ufw firewall
- ssh keys only with non-standard port
- rate limiting on rpc
- kernel hardening with sysctl
- apparmor/selinux profiles
Vulnerabilities it would solve
documented problems that the tool would mitigate:
| Vulnerability | Solution |
|---|---|
| Eclipse attacks (node isolation) | peer diversification and limit per IP |
| RPC 8232 publicly exposed | localhost only + reverse proxy with auth |
| SSH brute force | fail2ban + rate limiting + keys only |
| Dependencies with CVEs | automated auditing + verified updates |
| OOM during sync | optimized configuration for limited VPS |
common errors it would automate:
- missing dependencies like libclang protobuf etc
- incompatible rust version
- port conflicts
- insufficient disk space
- clock sync issues
Security concerns and answers
auto-updates are dangerous
- they are not automatic the system notifies shows changelog verifies GPG signature and you confirm
- automatic rollback if the node doesnt sync post-update
web dashboard is an attack vector
- rpc never exposed directly
- https mandatory with lets encrypt
- auth with unique password + optional 2fa
- rate limiting + blocking after failed attempts
The novel part: security sidecar
i did some research and there is no open-source equivalent for this:
- daemon in go running alongside zebrad
- detects eclipse attacks and anomalies
- blocks dangerous rpc commands
- automatic alerts
- lightweight for limited vps
the closest thing is blockdaemon trust center but thats enterprise and closed-source
Comparison with existing tools
| Feature | Umbrel | Start9 | DAppNode | ZNode Sentinel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zcash-native | No | No | Partial | Yes |
| Local HTTPS | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Granular permissions | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Shielded transactions | N/A | N/A | N/A | Optimized |
| License | PolyForm NC | Open Source | Open Source | Open Source |
Current status
i have around 20% developed already (prototypes and basic docker compose) but before continuing i want to know what you guys think
What i would like to know
- does this approach make sense technically?
- do you see any security problems i havent considered?
- what features would be most important to you?
- do you know of any similar tool im missing?
- is it worth continuing to develop this?
any technical feedback or criticism is welcome


