Yes, that looks suspicious. Some of those addresses havenât done anything else besides claiming and transfer it to supermc.eth. Hope itâs not a generalized event.
Seems they managed to slip multiple addresses onto the whitelist. In any event, it looks like they are providing a degree of liquidity/market making to the project. This has value to our community, so I would hesitate to raise the pitchforks too soon.
1 Like
edit: to remove a quote from somebody else I put here accidentally
Yeah, it doesnât matter that much. Iâve got mine and I like them as the present they are. And maybe the guy is a marketing magician and is able to rise the floor price to the thousands!, wouldnât it be nice?
1 Like
Lol, a guy with a bunch to offload isnât raising the floor. His selling strategy isnât exactly complex to figure out.
1 Like
Sure, it doesnât look like it but maybeâŚThe guy is a marketing magician!!!
maybe
Yes, the marketing magician⌠who just undercuts other sellers until either he runs out of NFTs or buyers run out of money.
1 Like
Cool!
Costs estimate; The network gas cost is down to 005-006 which would mean about 0.09 ETH for 16 ($100-120 depending on where ETH is at the time)
To the topic about âmint cheatingâ accounts, this one deserves attention.
4 items minted, and 36 other NFT mints all transferred directly in
0x1ea35680b40f6bba3ecea78b500cbbb532ad17b7 - Profile | OpenSea
3 Likes
Why not destroy the rest directly to improve its scarcity?
1 Like
That would be a waste. They are scarce enough as it is limited to 10,000. So long as there are at least 10,000 zcash supporters, they will all be worth a lot.
2 Likes
Wouldnât it be better to have 1 million supporters for mint 1 million? Who will provide market value management at that time?
If he can guarantee market value management, I also agree with his plan. I just hope that the project can become bigger and stronger.
Thank you! I bought 2 after i missed the whitelist, but I am stoked to get some more!
1 Like
Will the cznft community be activated from June 18th? Or does the community become active after the additional issuance?
I would at least put them on red notice. If there are community efforts in the future that I want to do for Zero NFT communities, I would want to exclude those addresses that have significant fingerprint of a sybil attacker.
I think we can start an effort similar to Hopâs sybil hunters
What the heck are yall talking about?
2 Likes
Yes, thatâs fair. However, you may be wrong. I know for sure who one of the specified addresses belongs to and it has nothing to do with the alleged bundle, because it is on its own.
There is also an obvious difference between a purchase and sale transaction and transfers. A transfer may indicate a connection (and most likely it is), but again, a transfer cannot be a guaranteed proof of a connection, since people may be familiar outside of opensea (non-market deal).
In addition, blocking any addresses will not solve the problem. The person will immediately show up from another address, because as far as I understand there will be no white list now. In general, there are more questions than answers.
1 Like
If I wanted to do an airdrop in the future to the original NFT minters, I probably would want to make sure that those addresses with red notice are excluded.
1 Like
on the website there are some of the cypherpunks shown with traits I have not seen browsing through the minted collection, are these not released yet? I really like the hoodie and cigarette traits!
I also like these 1:1, but unfortunately they are within 200 of the first number.
1 Like
@rosenthvl would you please confirm that the last NFT to be minted in the upcoming public mint is number 7600