Future of Zcash dev funding — megathread / everything in one place

Not gonna lie, I found the hangout rather disconcerting. I really enjoyed it (best Zcash T-shirt so far!) and I want to say thanks to everyone :yellow_heart:

When it comes to what we’re trying to do here however, we need to remember that its not experimental funding, it’s funding experiments. The funding is the means. Zcash exists because lots of people had some seriously wild ideas and experimented with them.
(if any of you feel like that’s a self contradictory statement just remember that one is science and the other ain’t)
I know some people know this but its rather apparent some people don’t. I hope they’ll come around to understand that Zcash really is special. :zcash:


link to hangout? thanks.

1 Like

I dont have the link to the recording yet but it should be around pretty soon I would think

1 Like

Here ya go!

Forum thread —> Zcash Protocol Hangout, Dev Fund Edition #2

1 Like

governance, onward!


The list of proposals on this thread and here is updated now to the best of my knowledge!

1 Like

I’ve submitted a last-minute ultra-simplified variant of some of the other proposals: “Keep It Simple, Zcashers (KISZ): 10% to ECC, 10% to ZFnd”

Canonical Github PR: https://github.com/zcash/zips/pull/293

Proposal-specific thread: ZIP: "Keep It Simple, Zcashers (KISZ): 10% to ECC, 10% to ZFnd"


This ZIP proposes:

After the 1st Zcash Halvening, when the “Founder’s Reward” system-bootstrapping protocol-based development funding expires, continue to direct 20% of new ZEC issuance to development-related activities for ongoing research, development, innovation, and maintenance of Zcash.

Assign half of such funds to the ECC, and half to the ZFnd. Continue this allocation until the 2nd Halvening.


Hey folks, I’ve heard some positive comments about the Zcash community decision process recently:

  • “Lots of people are sleeping on the ZcashFoundation ElectricCoinCo DevFund debates. This is the most sophisticated debate/discussion on post-launch dev funding for a blockchain project in history…” — https://twitter.com/lex_node/status/1195718760616865796, plus see also the rest of the attached thread.

  • “I couldn’t agree more with this thread The amount of quality discussion that has been taking place is amazing! I’m bullish on the ElectricCoinCo & ZcashFoundation as well as the community to settle on the best decision for the Zcash protocol & the ZEC community as a whole…” — https://twitter.com/decentralistdan/status/1195776252336115712

  • “Catching up on mhluongo’s governance proposal for ZCash foundation & dev funding. Outside the circumstance itself, the discussion thread is an excellent case study for anyone that wants to learn more about decentralized protocol governance.”—https://twitter.com/Goltra/status/1196870691259219968

  • I personally sat at a table with some of the leaders of multiple other well-funded, prominent crypto projects a few days ago, and I was surprised to learn that they all have substantial structural problems in their governance, such as having a for-profit company and a non-profit foundation, but the boards and management of the two are actually the same people — or mostly the same people — so that the two organizations don’t have real independence. One of them said to me “I’m amazed at how strong the Zcash governance structure is. I’m envious. I so much wish we could have that.” (which story I previously recounted in reddit)

I agree with these people! The Zcash community is awesome. Throughout some extremely difficult circumstances, you’ve demonstrated how to act as a values-oriented, constructive, thoughtful community. I’m super proud to be a part of it.


Oh yeah, and see this article about the Zcash community by Leigh Cuen in Coindesk if you haven’t already: https://www.coindesk.com/zcash-trademark-talks-were-about-more-than-a-logo


Another one:

By the way, I didn’t point this out in my previous comment, but none of these people who are praising the quality of the discussion — none of them are randos that I’ve never heard of before. They’re all people who have positive track records in the industry or at least they’re people that I started following and paying attention to long ago because they seemed to be thoughtful and interesting.


@zooko, thanks for this perspective. Likewise to @acityinohio who expressed similar sentiments elsewhere. I’d like to chime in!

We all have gripes and critiques, but taking a step back? I too haven’t seen any decentralized governance process deciding things on this scale of importance, complexity and contentiousness, and doing it anywhere this well. The depth of discussion and the constructive spirit here are outstanding.

We will be churning through this for a while still, and we will do some things better next time, but also: the Zcash community will emerge from this stronger, more informed and better bonded.

Down the road, when people ask, “so how did you make decentralized financial privacy happen, earlier this century?”, we’ll get to honestly give them this impossible answer: a bunch of us showed up on the Internet, and we debated until we figured it out.


Amen. I am not unwaveringly optimistic, but I feel pretty good about how we’re all doing so far. (“We” being the Zcash community at large.) Our half-designed half-emergent governance is flawed, and it’s painful to bite the bullet on tradeoffs. Certainly, grappling with more of those is imminent. Yet I still think that we’re muddling our way toward a good-faith outcome that will support Zcash and its purposes. Its telos, even!

The challenge is to balance utopian dreams against pragmatic constraints :stuck_out_tongue: I find it comforting to remember that any person or group who wants to change the world will face that challenge. The only way out is through!


Hey folks, for people who (like me) aren’t realistically going to sit through two hours of video, we made a summary of our recent livestream, which includes the state of the project from our perspective, the Electric Coin Company’s operations and plans, and our stance on the dev fund.


ZEC/USD and ZEC/BTC all time low incoming…
Let’s see what the price will be after the dev fund debate is over. Probably $10 or even less. With a burn rate of $750k/month the ECC has a pretty grim future. Are you still sure that you do not want to lower your burn rate drastically or do you wanna wait till ZEC really hits single digits @zooko ?


Looks like there are increasingly more community members who think that ECC should lower its burn rate taking the current price development into account.

Are ECC and ZF just going to stop operations and their work on Zcash in case the price hits $10 and stays there till the halving?
I guess they would need to downsize massively and lay off a majority of the team.

What is the plan in case the Zcash price is going to experience another hard year in 2020?

Is ECC just waiting for a miracle to happen or don’t they wanna prepare to secure their solvency?

1 Like

This is exactly what they said, they will work as long as there is money, they won’t change anything. Running out of money will switch to other projects. The mission will be on the fund, how much money will be so much and there will be work on the project.
In addition, the reduction means that plans for 2020 will not be realized, so the strategy will be to see this is the last chance. Everything could be done differently, but we have it.

1 Like

Voted… felt good…


I still think the proposal of @Blocktown and @JamesTodaroMD is the best when it comes to an extension of a miners tax. I am generally against it but if ECC wants to receive another part of the block rewards after the halving it needs to send positive signals to the market.

Are they seriously not recognizing that a majority of the crypto community members and leaders see it as a bad signal if the dev fund continues to amount 20% of the block rewards?

ECC is claiming that they are all-in on Zcash? Lowering the percentage in miners tax would give ECC an incentive to act in harmony with investors interests. If not ECC will go bankrupt in a few months. No matter if they will receive 10% or 20%, they need a sharp increase in the price of Zcash in order to survive.

In case ECC manages to regain trust from the community I can see the price recovering to three digits again. This would ensure that funding is secured.

Is seriously nobody of the ECC and ZF seeing it this way?
Most of you have a way broader knowledge in math than me and know that 10% of $200 is more than 20% of $10.

The last three years were pretty depressing for the Zcash price. Nobody knows why, but I am suspecting that the price will stay depressed if ECC will not change their strategy and stance on a possible dev fund. I advise ECC to start to listen to the market and what investors have to tell them or 2020 will be the last year of their operations, plus 30 people will lose their job and reputation!


Totally agree with this. I abandoned my own proposals in favour of the Blocktown proposals which is in my opinion as well the best one.

I have my doubts this would/could happen the next 5 years with the inflation rate for this period and the more than low demand.

I wonder that my own. The low price hurts the ECC and ZF most and i think i mentioned it allready 1001 times for the time being here. It’s amazing how even a change in the inflation rate isn’t considered earlier and BTC is/has been taken for the issuance. It’s indeed amazing and i fully agree with your statement in the quotes.

It’s not rocket science. It’s the inflation vs. low demand, easy and simple as that. And as a bonus unfortunatly we (including me) distributed with the change to Asics to even less demand. As said, no rocket science that if there is more supply than demand price goes down. At least i’am 100% sure it’s the main factor beside some other factors.


I do not think the emission schedule should be changed. This would be another mistake like letting ASICs overtake.

The demand for Zcash needs to rise massively. Under the current conditions and with the current strategy this is not going to happen and nobody at ECC wants to see this.

@Zooko says that ECC will probably not apply for the role of the principal developer in case they will not receive the amount and form of funding they want.

Another mistake he makes there and another bad signal for the market. This is definitely not “all-in on Zcash” in my opinion. I do not know if I should see this as influencing the dev fund debate or as extortion of the community that they should vote for the proposal which gives 20% of future block rewards to the ECC and ZF.

I could not imagine what else ECC should do and how else they wanna earn money apart from Zcash. Sure, @Zooko has some nice advisor roles like at Tezos. At least things are going well over there. Maybe the $25k he got worth of XTZ will be soon worth more than the FR he received. I would be relaxed as well if I would be in his spot. This is the case for not only Zooko but also some other founding members who had a decent allocation of the FR. Employees who have been working for a salary without directly profiting from the FR and are not that well connected in the space will be the losers, alongside with everyone who ever put money into Zcash.

ECC and especially employees who received a good percentage of the FR should take a step back and think about people who lost a lot of money due to Zcash. Their balances diminished while your balances increased. Do you think this is how “empowering everyone with economic freedom” looks like? A few founders become rich while everyone else loses their money and jobs?

This is how it looks like for lots of people out there. The critiques of the FR and dev fund would become less if you would accept a lower allocation of the block rewards and would bring economic success to people who have been supporting you financially since 2016. As you can see your seed investors, who are by the way the only investors who profited from Zcash, are not going to help you out of this situation.

Why you still do not want to take responsibility for this situation that you put yourself in and accept that you need to downsize? ECC is not in the spot to cherry-pick anymore. You need to deal with a very difficult situation now. The current management is delusional. Maybe this happens if you block/mute most of your critiques and just surround yourself with people who are always enthusiastic about your ideas and agree with everything you are saying. There seems to be no debate about this within the ECC.

Again, there is not much time left and you guys should act now!