Oh I see what you’re saying.
Yes, I agree. I don’t particularly care about a separate legal entity as that is an implementation detail. I do care about autonomy from ZF and not having ZF influence the decision making process of that MG organization. To this end, as long as the MG review committee is not breaking US law (and thus jeopardizing the ZF legally as a US entity) it seems we can create a governance structure that keeps it autonomous. The rest of the points around the purpose of the MG being somewhat independent of the broader ZF mission still stand I think.