i don’t see this happening. if community wants MGRC to not be proactive believe original ZIP should be reworded to exclude these types of activities. really don’t think the community voted for MGRC to act in the exact same manner as the foundation (sits back and waits for proposals to evaluate). honestly, this would be a redundancy. imo, would be unwise to build-up MGRC as a redundant bureaucracy
if i get elected - going to advocate a certain % of funds get directed towards outreach