I am using this message to register my opposition to the 1-year term limits for MGRC seats.
In the course of fulfilling my due diligence obligations as a Voter, I’ve come to the following conclusion.
Holding elections every year is too expensive.
Voters will either fail to fulfill their due-diligence obligations, or they will have to forgo significant other opportunities.
Moreover single year terms is a premature optimization. It’s likely (given the current slate of candidates) that the MGRC members will be individually spectacular, and well constrained by their peers with respect to error/malfeasance etc.
Finally, the opportunity cost reasoning will apply multiplicatively to candidates. This is counter to the efficient function of the MGRC. It’s a bad idea. One year terms are too short.
I want to know how to fix this obvious bug.