I value the time you are putting into the forums and zcash. I happy we are having this conversation.
yeah, it was the word official. I see where you are coming from with it, and your forum involvement specifically has been really candid and useful. - my issue is I have no mechanism as a community member to guarantee my voice is heard. - the mgrc is a community project, not a for profit like the ecc.
but we have seen little to no movement on the ethics stuff, the hours, etc. Meeting updates are great, but official communication to out of band questions really helps.
A good example is you are getting a lot of feedback and forum involvement over liteclients. is perfection the enemy of good here? Could your position be changed (not you specifically, the mgrc) I dont feel the mgrc stance on lightclients, if we could chat about, it might change.
It feels like the threads are dead. there is no room for movement from the community to help, only the proposer and the mgrc. so potentially we just lost two liteclients. both I recommend to people. the mgrc laid out their objections. the devs responded. this just feels strange.
3 light clients is better than 1. 2 sdk’s can implement different feature sets, idk. I dislike redundancy for the sake of it, but I think we need it for the moment at least. I vaguely remember
Nothing is stopping you forming something or using something already out there, indeed I remember having a chat with josh c about how this was a priority (I can dig out the post if you like), much like chilibobs request. - MGRC COI, COC and COE - #9 by ChileBob - why was this thread just dropped?
a recent call were the ecc wallet team was amazed at the work zecwallet and nighthawk had done for both UX and MEMO’s - it could be argued that zcash should upstream from them and then integration test - we are meant to be moving (slowly) away from the ECC, if that means they have to get more involved with comunnity wallet ppl. go for it.
I agree long term though, although I dont think the ECC version will be the one. we will see.
- so it is official, mgrc will attend gardening club. Is this going to cost us (the community) extra?
In this thread I agree with autotunafish. - ZOMG: Should it be proactive in finding grantees?
So whilst conversation is great, where is the /officially/ supported 2 way communication method between the community and the mgrc. - it was implied that recipients would have to use the forums. is this still the case? What is the applicants officially supported method for two way communication with the community
Anyway I im going to try to get back to sleep for a couple of hours before i have to start doing things.
I am not asking people to sign things in blood here. These are reasonable questions. I walk into a fast food shop I can contact someone, through an official channel and get an official response. I am not saying every post has to be official I am asking where do I have to post it at least think my feedback is being taken seriously and maybe get an official response.