Thank you for your answer.
I appreciate you going into the details of how you see the current situation, it sounds to me like we are fundamentally aligned.
Now, if the proposal of @areta did not get approved and we have no-one taking the time to challenge the unilateral decisions of our three CEOs, how can any of this have any credibility to ZEC holders? A somewhat neutral third party clearing things up was literally a way to help diffuse a conflict that has been and can remain quite damaging to us. I personally cannot think of any higher priority in Zcash.
It’s literally what I suggest as well. The technical community would make a bi-yearly (for example; investors can’t review things all year long) proposal and the ZEC holders approve or refuse, with their decision being binding. I have even suggested we create some kind of “ZEC Unit 21000” group to facilitate coordination between ZEC holders.