Proposal: ZCG under FPF

TL;DR:

  1. FPF proposes that the Zcash Community Grants (ZCG) committee become an independent committee underneath the FPF umbrella as an interim step towards possible future full independence. (Proposed Actions)
  2. The ZecHub bounty program is now being administered by FPF through the end of 2024. (Pending Actions)
  3. FPF will provide fee-based administrative and operational support to unincorporated organizations and discrete projects so that they can maximize their impact in a resource constrained environment. (About FPF)

Proposed Actions:

FPF proposes that the Zcash Community Grants (ZCG) committee become an Autonomous Entity (AE) under the FPF umbrella. This action has been under discussion with FPF and ZCG, and ZCG is in favor of this arrangement as an interim step towards full entity independence. FPF believes the following benefits will be realized by this relationship:

  1. FPF is eager to work with ZCG and the Zcash community to discuss and implement program and process improvements. Current and potential future resource constraints require a focus on program and process efficiency, accountability, and the ability to have the time and visibility to change tack as circumstances demand. ZCG must continue to evolve into a flexible and scalable program, and FPF is well-positioned to support that evolution.
  2. As detailed below under “Objectives”, FPF is structured to provide enhanced support to AE’s under the FPF umbrella. This support includes the provision of resources that will ultimately contribute to full entity independence if that is determined to be the ultimate desired outcome.
  3. Positioning ZCG as an Autonomous Entity (AE) under the FPF will contribute to the decentralization of the Zcash ecosystem, a clear priority for the Zcash Community. This will be achieved through the growth of a new offshore organization (FPF) and the further distribution of a critical ecosystem program (community grants) away from a key ecosystem resource with other critical ecosystem responsibilities, the Zcash Foundation (ZF). In addition, if ZCG is selected to receive a portion of community funding (pending, TBD) that “slice” will be administered by a non-US entity, further contributing to ecosystem decentralization.
  4. Moving ZCG from under the Zcash Foundation (ZF) will help extend ZF’s resources and assist the organization in focusing on Zebra, FROST, and other community programs.

The annual fee-for-service for year one would be $145,000. This fee includes the cost of support personnel and all required services, including accounting, custody, and operational accounts but excludes the cost of a grants program (Submittable or other, TBD) and ZCG member stipends. Note that the cost of FPF’s annual organizational fees (registered agent, government fees, etc.) will be borne by FPF and will not be passed on to AEs. For reference, the Zcash Foundation’s 2023 ZCG support costs were $221,246 including allocated staff time. That figure does not include $103,510 in ZCG member stipends that were paid by ZF in 2023.

FPF invites the community to provide their input on this proposal.

Pending Actions:

ZCG approved ZecHub’s grant request which includes FPF’s administration of the ZecHub Bounty Program through the end of 2024. ZecHub will retain ownership of the bounty program, its strategic direction, and decisions regarding bounty recipients. FPF will handle only the administration of program payouts and the associated due diligence and accounting activities. This partnership with FPF will strengthen both ZecHub and the bounty program, ultimately benefiting the Zcash Community.

About FPF

Introduction:

The Financial Privacy Foundation (FPF) seeks to address a critical need for operational and financial management support among unincorporated organizations and ad-hoc groups in the cryptocurrency space, with a specific focus on privacy-focused protocols. These organizations, primarily focused on completing technically challenging and innovative products and services, frequently lack the resources to manage their operational and financial affairs effectively. FPF aims to bridge this gap by providing a fully scaled organizational structure and comprehensive back-office support, ensuring these groups can focus on their primary mission and maximize their impact.

About and Mission Statement:

FPF’s mission is to educate and empower individuals and communities to take control of their financial privacy and security, and to promote a fair and equitable financial system that respects personal privacy. One way FPF delivers on this mission is to support other like-minded entities as they scale their operations, providing them with the ability to focus on their core competencies.

FPF is an independent Cayman Islands incorporated non-profit foundation governed by a board of directors and a Supervisor.

Start-Up Funding:

A start-up grant of $250,000 (in ZEC) was provided by the Zcash Foundation. This is an active grant focused on organizational start-up, the provision of an experimental grants program, and several other community-focused deliverables. This grant will cover required FPF organizational fees (gov’t fees, registered agent, etc.) through the end of 2025.

FPF has become a fully functioning non-profit organization with a scalable infrastructure, ready to support any pace of growth.

Objectives:

The overall objective is to provide a comprehensive suite of operations, administrative, and financial management support to Autonomous Entities (AEs) under the FPF umbrella. AEs will be free to focus on their core competencies while being confident that their non-core activities are receiving the attention and expertise they require including:

  1. Operational Support: Provide administrative assistance, including office management, record keeping, and compliance with regulatory requirements.
  2. Financial Management: Offer services such as bookkeeping, financial reporting, budgeting, and payment infrastructure to ensure financial transparency and sustainability.
  3. Capacity Building: Conduct training and workshops to build the operational and financial management skills of unincorporated organizations. Provide resources and support for scaling operations for entities interested in eventually transitioning to fully independent organizational status.
  4. Resource Optimization: Help organizations optimize their resources and improve their overall operational and administrative efficiency.

Target Beneficiaries:

  1. Unincorporated organizations with minimal or no operational infrastructure (AEs)
  2. Ad-hoc groups (time-bound or permanent)
  3. Incorporated organizations that require project-based support (menu of support options would be limited from those provided to unincorporated entities).

Funding Model (Fee-For-Service Model):

FPF will utilize a fee-for-service model for hosting Autonomous Entities (AEs). FPF will strive to provide comprehensive support services without a profit motive, in-line with our charitable status and mission.

Note: FPF intends to transact in shielded ZEC whenever possible, including contractor payments.

Reporting:

FPF will commit to publishing progress reports on the Zcash Community Forum in the event that FPF provides services to Zcash community entities.

Structure:

FPF will utilize a committee structure to ensure entities have independence in all aspects of their work while enjoying the support of FPF and the benefits of being part of a Cayman incorporated non-profit organization. The basic structure is as follows:

Risks + Mitigation:

  1. Risk 1: Regulatory risk is inherent in every crypto-focused project. While Cayman has thus far proved to be a friendly jurisdiction there are plenty of examples of abrupt policy and regulatory actions by previously friendly administrations. If actions were taken that reduce or remove the benefits associated with Cayman incorporation, FPF would look to move to a friendlier domicile, putting pressure on the organization’s treasury and personnel focus.
  2. Risk 2: FPF has accomplished our original goal of securing funding for start-up activities while ensuring surplus funds are allocated for all non-personnel organizational costs through the end of 2025. If these estimated costs were to rise significantly, or if unanticipated expenses were required to be incurred (legal fees, government fees, etc.), FPF would need to secure additional funding.
  3. Risk 3: FPF is well-positioned to address support and administrative gaps within the Zcash Community. However, there is a risk of centralizing too many projects and services under the FPF entity, which could negatively impact the long-term sustainability of the Zcash protocol. Therefore, FPF must be selective in the projects it undertakes to ensure it remains effective and valuable to the Zcash Community in the future.
  4. Risk 4: FPF acknowledges that conflicts of interest must be avoided. FPF will take steps over the coming months to address any perceived conflicts.

Conclusion:

FPF will play a crucial role in strengthening the operational and financial capabilities of unincorporated organizations in the Zcash ecosystem and beyond. By providing essential back-office support, FPF will enable these organizations to focus on their core missions, ultimately leading to a more vibrant and effective Zcash Community. We seek the support and collaboration of the Zcash Community to bring this vision to fruition.

11 Likes

Is it true that the Executive Director of the FPF is @Alex_ZF, who is also the current COO of the Zcash Foundation, and that both organizations share at least one board member, @amber? Are there any other overlaps? Are there plans to fully decouple the two organizations?

fwiw, I like and respect both Alex and Amber. I’m not assuming anything nefarious is happening here, but I can’t see the ZF and FPF as separate organizations while under shared leadership.

5 Likes

The way that I’ve been thinking of ZF and FPF with some shared individuals, is similar to SpaceX, Tesla, X.com exist with Elon Musk floating around amongst them all.

1 Like

Those are for-profit businesses - something entirely different. Zcash is a public good and both orgs are being paid, and seeking funding from the community through the protocol. And ZF is heavily involved with Zcash governance and funding decisions.

For FPF to be considered independent from ZF, it needs to have leadership independent from the ZF.

This matters.

5 Likes

I don’t personally think it matters. Good Leadership is good leadership regardless of a corporation’s tax/ regulatory status, in whichever random nation they happen to exist.

If the folks atop ZF and FPF are good leaders, then we have no issue. If they are incapable, corrupt, coercive, etc, then we have a problem.

rhetorical
Are you suggesting there are problems with Jack, Alex, Amber, etc?

FPF isn’t seeking ZEC funding afaik (?)

Amber’s ZF board seat will be up for election shortly, removing that connection. As for my role, we’ll evaluate what changes need to be made once next steps are clear.

Josh, I agree, this does matter, but some of these plates need to stop spinning before we take any final action on my role. For now I’m a volunteer at FPF.

4 Likes

Correct, we are not seeking any direct funding. We believe our value is in providing support to other orgs so they can contribute to the best of their abilities to the Zcash ecosystem.

5 Likes

Thanks Alex, and I totally understand. But in these communications with the community, I believe its important that you are abundantly clear that you are both the ED of FPF and currently a leader and paid employee of ZF.

I would love to see FPF thrive on its own, and you’d be a great leader if that path is there for you. However, until the conflicts are resolved, my concern remains.

5 Likes

Speaking as a ZCG committee member:

I fully support FPF’s proposal for ZCG to become an independent committee under FPF as an interim step toward full independence. While I share some of @joshs’s concerns about the relationship between FPF and ZF, I believe these issues will be addressed and resolved over time.

At this time, it is not economically feasible for ZCG to become fully independent. This transition would provide the committee with more autonomy and the necessary resources to operate effectively. Additionally, since FPF is domiciled in the Cayman Islands, it ensures that ZCG’s potential future portion of the Dev Fund is allocated to a non-US entity, which helps promote much needed geographic decentralization.

I have worked closely with Alex and his team at ZF over the past two and a half years. He is a strong leader who provides a high standard of operational and administrative support. I have no doubt that the same level of support will be provided to ZCG by FPF.

11 Likes

Exciting and bold, I think this is an interesting first step towards ZCG independence, something I’ve supported.

ZecHub’s bounty will now be administered by FPF, something we are excited about. I’d like to report back in December a recap of the process, and present feedback to the community.

Good luck :shield:

7 Likes

I endorse this proposal. ZCG moving under FPF would provide the community a grant making body with improved autonomy, jurisdictional diversity, and serve as a steping stone towards full ZCG independence. I agree with all of the points that Jason made. In the past I have been vocal about the timing being bad for such a move due to budget constraints. I’ve since changed my mind given recent dev fund discussions and think that ZCG needs to start taking action to move away from ZF in order to ensure that decentralization remains a core principal of the ecosystem. If we find ourselves in a situation where this is threatened, then ZCG should be able to exercise an option towards complete independence under a similar structure, but not under FPF.

7 Likes