Resetting Zcash: its about privacy, not scale, econ, dev funds, or governance

Thank you for writing honestly and directly about what I have been saying for 2 years now, what is happening behind the scenes should stop and rallied by one goal and having funds for this, the developers and the fund, and now ZOMG, should hear potential and remaining supporters of ZCASH to become a community! (my thoughts on the usefulness of T addresses remained the same, but I agree that when they cease to be useful and this should happen, then they need to be abandoned). The change in the direction of work should make it so that the project could exist and develop in the first place, for this it would be good to approve the main indicators by which it is possible to determine growth and success, and to do an analysis every month.
What actions and changes bring growth and what not and what to do next, 4 years in my opinion passed in vain, during this time it was possible and necessary to seek acceptance not by exchanges and exchanges, but to recruit a large number of users and supporters, who were subsequently united by one idea could make real economic freedom for all.
I personally would like to conduct an analysis of adoption and adoption for the first 4 years with checkpoints, it is important to understand what was done that was beneficial for adoption and what was not, so that in the future there would be no mistake and not make mistakes. I consider a slide from ECC on the distribution of zec on leading exchanges to be incomplete without other indicators, to achieve that the goods are in all stores and no one buys or uses it cannot be a business plan for a successful company!
(Supply, availability and need, of the required 3 components, ECC and the fund implemented the first 2, without the need for sense 0)

4 Likes