Zcash Halvening & NU 6: Embracing the New Dev Fund

Today, we have entered a new era for Zcash, as we ushered in its second halvening and with it, the activation of Network Upgrade 6 (NU 6), which implemented a new Zcash development fund (Dev Fund). The new non-direct funding model (NDFM) replaces the old direct funding model (DFM), which was allocating 20% of all block subsidies between three entities: Zcash Community Grants (ZCG), Electric Coin Company (ECC) and Zcash Foundation (ZF).

With NU 6 deployed, 12% of the block subsidies are now routed to a “Lockbox”, where the funds will accumulate until the Zcash community reaches a consensus on a non-direct disbursement mechanism, ensuring support for vital projects driving Zcash development and adoption. The wallet addresses of ECC and ZF have been removed from the protocol, but ZCG will continue to receive an 8% allocation for an additional year to fund community initiatives through grants.

Zcash Halvening

NU 6 coincides with the second Zcash halvening—an event that reduces the block subsidy by 50%, from 3.125 ZEC to 1.5625 ZEC per block, lowering the rate at which new ZEC is generated. The Halvening is a significant economic shift that aligns with the principles of scarcity and value, similar to halving events in other major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.

Zcash Development Fund

The New Lockbox Mechanism

Developed in response to community input from the July voting session and outlined in ZIP 1015, the Lockbox mechanism is a pivotal aspect of the NU 6 upgrade, reflecting Zcash ecosystem’s commitment to community-driven governance. The Lockbox is a deferred funding pool designed to secure the Zcash Dev Fund, while the community works on a new non-direct funding model that aligns the funding of Zcash work with the wishes of the community.

Out With the Old

Under the old direct funding model, a number of specific wallet addresses were embedded directly into the protocol to fund Zcash development work through ZCG, and at ECC and ZF. This funding model lasted four years and expired today.

Earlier this year, ECC’s CEO Josh Swihart announced his plans to end direct funding for ECC. “Setting aside our financial self-interests at ECC, we believe the Zcash protocol should be set free. And that in setting the protocol free, we have the best chance of setting the world free. In that light, we have decided not to accept funds directly from the protocol under a new development fund. Our wallet address will no longer be codified in the protocol.”

Months of forum discussions followed, and after many debates, surveys, and polls, the community voted to end direct funding for all Zcash organizations, granting ZCG a temporary extension to keep the smaller projects going.

In With the New

While the old DFM ensured ongoing development within the Zcash ecosystem, it also introduced poor incentives, making it difficult to hold Dev Fund recipients accountable to the community that was funding them. In July of 2024 the community voted to move to grants-based funding, a non-direct funding model (NDFM) that requires Dev Fund recipients, regardless of their size and status, to submit concrete proposals, compete for funding, report on their progress, and deliver on their promises in order to continue to receive community support.

The transition to NDFM began with the addition of the Lockbox under NU 6, from which all funds will eventually be released through community consensus. The next step is to decide on and build out the fund disbursement mechanism for the Lockbox.

Hybrid Deferred Dev Fund

The community also voted to extend direct funding for ZCG by one year. Under the temporary Hybrid Deferred funding model 12% of the block subsidy will go to the Lockbox and 8% will be distributed to the Financial Privacy Foundation (FPF), for the express use by ZCG for community grants. This interim solution ensures that independent teams within the Zcash ecosystem continue to receive necessary funding while the Lockbox’s disbursement mechanism is finalized.

Looking Forward

For miners and users, the Halvening may affect market dynamics and profitability, as the reduced block subsidy impacts the economics of mining and holding ZEC. Developers and community members will benefit from increased involvement in fund governance, marking a significant step towards a more decentralized and community-driven ecosystem.

Today’s network upgrade marks a significant evolution in Zcash’s journey as we implement community-supported enhancements. We look forward to seeing how these developments will shape the future of Zcash.

Onward.

22 Likes

this is a huge step in right direction for zcash… but one of my obvious worries is that coin voting governance is dominated by one of zooko’s friends that got like 300K ZEC basically free from the founders reward era and hes now in control of voting until we have a voting machine that includes more than only shielded ZEC. if we really want to get serious about coin voting then we need shielded AND transparent ZEC to have equal opportunity for voting. AND we need a way to parse out the dominating power of the powers that be who are Zookos friends from the original launch where massive amounts of ZEC were given directly to a tiny chunk of insiders. cough cough GoJo friends…

crazy to look back and see Zooko deleted his comment(s) requirement for a repolling of the first coin vote after his friend failed to participate in the first deadline… then to our surprise… hanh reran the poll and the ZEC voting total jumped by like 350K ZEC from what was originally 100K ZEC

whats the point of it, why go thru the theater act when its simpler to just let Z’s friend be an authority figure in Zenate and then just exclude his massive bag of ZEC from coin voting

1 Like

If your ZEC’s aren’t shielded, you’re simply not part of the privacy and freedom preserving movement. You are just some random guy waiting for the slightest price appreciation to dump on your nearest centralized exchange for fiat, that you truly worship. Hence you should have 0 voting rights.

2 Likes

Talk about a freudian slip for the ages… lmfao
just imagine causally looking around this community and seeing that theres some loud opinionated forum posters who believe the governance belongs under the control of a small chunk of the tech saavy insiders who received a lion share of the essentially free first 15% of the coin supply… never gonna see me on that stump. last i checked this is a project with fungibility in mind aka all ZEC should have the same voting power certainly no reason for a hierarchical coin voting system.

All coins have the same voting power. Whereas someone acquired them early or late, 1 zec is 1 zec. That’s fungibility.

3 Likes

I was referring to the OP complaint that founders got their ZEC “cheap”.

2 Likes

u cant vote with unshielded ZEC cause then it wont be private voting.

also everyone can shield their transparent ZEC for close to 0 fees and then unshield later if they wish to vote.
(tho i must say current voting only in ywallet is sth that is not perfect, every shielded wallet should be able to vote)

2 Likes

Based on the definition from the dictionary:

fun·gi·ble

/ˈfənjəbəl/

adjective

Law

  1. (of a product or commodity) replaceable by another identical item; mutually interchangeable.

And the fact that you can transfer from any pool, ZEC seems to fit the definition.

Would it be possible to enable voting directly from the Zashi wallet using shielded funds? This feature could incentivize the use of Zashi while promoting the shielding of assets, integrating both functionalities. Is this concept feasible for the future of voting?

4 Likes

In my opinion, voting for coins is complex, but interesting. Many may be upset because they have few Zec, others may feel more privileged because they have many Zec. In my opinion, there should be regulations to govern the voting rules. I am happy that there is this possibility of returning as a holder of Zec, I do not know if there are other projects with the same capacity. I am happy with the evolution of Zcash and with the various use cases, various possibilities.

Yes coin voting always leave some people bitter.
On one hand of the spectrum you have the socialists type who think that everybody should have an equal voice (even if their financial stake is negligible) and on the other hand you have the robber barons that want to use their large holdings to accumulate even more. In the middle of that you have more nuanced views.

But as a pooling tool coin voting is less dramatic and can help to better gauge sentiment.

2 Likes