IMO, we need to work with organizations that grow the ecosystem and refusing to work with Ledger for whatever principle is counterproductive. No user will bother understanding why we don’t partner with Ledger. They will say : “What is this coin that is not even supported by the most popular Hardware Wallet? They cannot be serious.”
Just to clarify that I did not in any way say blocklist Ledger forever. Also, my previous post was edited before hanh posted his reply. Ledger needs to show that they are a reliable partner before ZCG invests any significant amount of ZEC for Ledger apps.
Well precisely. It’s not because the protocol documentation wasn’t clear about the issue they had.
I know what issue that was, and I have a very good idea of exactly how much effort it should have taken for competent programmers to implement the fix (we were prepared to help them at any time). That it didn’t get fixed for so long was not an engineering problem. It was a “we don’t care” problem.
I’m in that Signal group. I must be careful not to reveal information from it that I haven’t been given explicit permission to reveal. However, it would be reasonable to infer something from the fact that being in that group has not altered the opinion I expressed in my previous post in the thread.
Did you do so? Unless I missed something, it looks like they didn’t respond.
Even if you can afford multiple hardware wallets, the current situation is still not great; the fact that the Keystone wallet moved ZEC into their “cypherpunk” firmware which only has ZEC, BTC, and XMR support means that you can’t use the same device to manage whatever other currencies you might hold.
WTF?!? I bought and used the multicoin firmware from the day one of ZEC integration, then I passed some weeks later to the cypherpunk firmware, but I didn’t realize that they moved the app and not copy it such as the Bitcoin one!
Sorry for my wrong statement and thanks for correction.