ECC:
- Zooko: BOSL
- Daira: MIT, or (BOSL/GPLv3 plus a broader exception that allows both permissionless forks and any Zcash-related use) (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #211 by daira)
- nuttycom: BOSL/GPLv3 (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #65 by nuttycom)
ZFND:
- Dodger: MIT (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #147 by Dodger)
- amiller: Not BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #32 by amiller)
- secparam: MIT, or at least BOSL/GPLv3 (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #140 by secparam)
QEDIT:
- PabloK: MIT (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #172 by PabloK)
Other:
- aiyadt (ZCG member + leader of Nighthawk): BOSL till the next halving, and then evaluate (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #104 by aiyadt)
- BrunchTime (ZCG member): BOSL with reassess in the future (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #191 by BrunchTime)
- tromer (“a Founding Scientist of ECC”): MIT, or at least BOSL/GPLv3 (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #105 by tromer)
- hanh (Wallet dev with multiple ZCG grants, indirect): BOSL is untenable for them (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #136 by aristarchus)
- tokidoki (Mod): Not BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #30 by tokidoki)
- Autotunafish (Regular who ran for ZCG): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #149 by Autotunafish)
- dontpanicburns (Regular who ran for ZCG): Not BOSL (Allow “special exception” to the Orchard codebase for the Monero Project - #136 by dontpanicburns)
- sgp (Cake Wallet person): MIT (Proposal to amend ZIP 1014 to require MIT license for core code)
- fireice_uk (Wallet Dev/Ryo): MIT (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #23 by fireice_uk)
- pitmutt (ZGo): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #199 by pitmutt)
- skyl (free2z.cash): MIT (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #194 by skyl)
- Myself (Wallet Dev/kinda L2?): MIT, BOSL is untenable
- heyrhett (ZClassic creator): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #42 by heyrhett)
- noamchom (“Senior SW Subsystems Tester”): MIT (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #189 by noamchom)
- parkkiho (Korean community member): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #229 by parkkiho)
- AidenZ (Korean community member): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #230 by AidenZ)
Other people who I don’t recognize and don’t know what description to use for, feel free to tell me:
- z.yodler: Not BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #56 by z.yodler)
- covfefe: BOSL/GPLv3 (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #144 by covfefe)
- tloriato: Not BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #150 by tloriato)
- zttat: BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #61 by zttat)
- B01AND (New account): BOSL (BOSL or MIT - Orchard - #62 by B01AND)
- gus: BOSL for 3 years
- Jgx7: BOSL
Forum polls: MIT leaning
Twitter people posted by zooko: BOSL
Current tally of the individual accounts listed above:
- 8 for BOSL (including three developers)
- 20 for some form of change (including 10 developers)
I listed organizations by association, not to claim the people speaking were speaking on behalf on them. If I copied a dated opinion, or misread it, please let me know. I also believe every MIT advocate follows secparam in a secondary preference for dual licensing.
I also presume Chammy is BOSL, yet didn’t see any explicit statements saying that. A lot of people asked questions/gave some opinion, but didn’t state a preference, and wasn’t included accordingly. If I missed you, feel free to comment your preference to be added.
IF YOU FEEL I MISREPRESENTED IN YOU IN ANY WAY, TELL ME AND I’LL CORRECT IT. THE END.