If elected, @cburniske would be the official member of the committee. My exact role will depend on what working for the MGRC will require from each member but, based on current information, I would expect to assist Chris with reading applications, searching for useful/relevant information, doing background checks on applicants, keeping track of progress updates, etc. This obviously does not mean that Chris himself won’t be doing these things. Rather, we’d be sharing the work load on an as-needed basis and discuss the pros and cons of concrete applications and/or progress reports before he brings his perspective to the MGRC meetings. My role would be supportive/advisory and, just like all other MGRC members, Chris would always have to make the final decision on whether to support a particular application or not. I don’t know if it would be possible for me to fill in for him at meetings/voting. I think this is something that should be clarified in official MGRC procedures/policies.