this could be good to consider now also.
just one thing with cosmso eco is it will be more compatible with ZSAs in future afaik.
this could be good to consider now also.
just one thing with cosmso eco is it will be more compatible with ZSAs in future afaik.
We will be testing our plan for v2 whitelist during Tuesday’s ZecHub sync. Cypherpunk Zero holders needed! ZecHub Wiki
Not working, I’m an owner of 220 CZ NFTs, the hack was discovered (hacker started exploiting it) after I started buying the NFTs. Almost none of the NFTs I hold are the stolen ones, I think I mistakently bought only a few of them.
I’ve been in contact with Josh and Jason (ZecHub) and asked to get my NFTs approved for the whitelist / remint or whatever happens next.
Full list of NFTs here:
0x9fc1d69c5bed6e8f565ba70399772aea370317d2
@Dodger @decentralistdan please approve my post here, it was hidden by your bot. Thank you.
When will CZNFT be reorganised, whether to consider airdrop in Sol, and the token of hairstyle zero in Sol chain?
Hey. Yes the date we are using for whitelist is prior to the theft by a couple of days.
We did this to make sure the attacker wasn’t able to profit from anything we build next. Whitelist will likely only give mint for up to 8 NFT’s per address anyway.
Inviting people to enter for v2 whitelist: ZecHub Wiki
We have started talks about the design for the new NFT collection. If you’re interested in giving input, please do. Hangouts are mainly on Discord.
What does this mean? 8 per address?
What happens to people who have more than 8 NFTs in one address?
Why do you decide this on your own?
It is a New Collection. We are not rebooting the same NFT collection. That is why I believe there should be a limit (my opinion). What the majority voice says is what I will put my personal time towards making.
Ways you can participate:
i guess always we/other parts of community could do a v1.5 or v3 etc of original collection that could maybe be exact copy. i just dont know how it could be done and then also which chain to use for it.
What is this sound?
Does anyone who owns more than 8 have to lose money?
josh or Does the ecc administrator know this as well?
People who bought it with money, do you want me to lose money?
Did tokidoki and others know this and sell it in advance?
If you don’t preserve the number of nft assets, I’ll share this widely. This is a clear fraud
Did you even read the 1st post? I think its outrageous to blame @squirrel for wanting to help build something from an experiement that didnt pan out. Take some responsibility, no one forced you click buy.
I appreciate your upset, we all are, but instead of finding someone else to blame, lets try and move forward constructively.
What experiment?
You’re dismissing a lot of transactions that happened at OpenSea as experiments?
Did you read the contents of the cz-nft site?
Do people who don’t have anything to do with zechub think this too?
If you continue to work this way, I will share this far away.
OpenSea has nothing to do with the origins of this project, and yes, if you choose to buy something on OpenSea, it is at your own risk. Ultra sound risk my friend.
I am speaking for myself, as a zcash community member.
Launching nft, writing something like that, getting hacked and only paying up to 8 regardless of the number of nft buyers?
Do you think people outside of ecc will understand this too?
Should we make this public on Twitter?
I think its super important to understand squirrel is doing this on his own behalf, for the community. He has nothing to do with the original ECC launch. You’re upset, but your blaming someone who is trying to help.
You should do whatever you think is right.
As we’ve explained, the initiative was for fun, full stop. It was a third-party hack to a third-party smart contract. The key that allows the fix to the smart contract was lost. I didn’t lose it, but before I came back to ECC, I personally spent hours trying to track it down.
We asked @squirrel if he had any ideas and he devised a plan. I agree with @dismad and I think he should be commended for that rather than attacked. If you have better suggestions, please share.
If you want to be clumsy, you’d better not do it
In the first place, there are many people who believed in the contents of the cz-nft site and bought it and shared it with people around them
The answer is certain
If you share this with people outside of ecc, how would it react?
Do you think it’s you?
Even if you can’t preserve the grade of nft, you have to preserve at least the number of nfts
If it was just a project to release and throw away, why did you write that on the ecc site?
Are you deceiving people?
what is this?
CZ NFT, which was people’s personal asset, was completely destroyed by ECC and ZECHUB.
The person who bought 220 NFTs for $80,000 4 months ago was ruined by your decision.
Ignoring community feedback because you don’t have time?
Not having time is an excuse.
Especially Josh, you are a very irresponsible person.
You continue to look down on these voices, make excuses, and ignore them.
Since you said that you completely stopped the CZ NFT project, is it natural for CZ NFT holders to be treated this way?
ZCash leaders and developers continue to be corrupt.
V2 is not clearly presented. Is it clearly thought out ? Best is not to issue something new . Rather make peace with the ones that got hurt. Send couple of Zecs to the hacked maybe, and don’t NFT again?