@zancas, I understand your rationale for wanting members of the MG committee to be compensated (both to retain them, and to give them an incentive-aligning stake).
Still, there’s the question of the amount of compensation. Setting it to a fixed amount of ZEC risks its being way too small or way too large in real value, depending on what happens to be the ZEC price when the member joins. Adjusting it by a community governance process (of the form that’s currently available) is very heavyweight. Putting it at the discretion of ZF solves that, but of course it raises questions about power and independence.
So, what concretely do you propose?
Also, it’s likely that some committee members will be unwilling or unable to accept payment (because of tax reasons or whatever).