that’s subjective
@kek i agree. it’s my own view.
I’d be happy to make a case for it, but I recognize that others may have a different view.
One concern I have is that the existing system doesn’t give people who care about a certain type of diversity or mixture in committee makeup a way to express that.
For example, if you and a majority of other voters thought it was important for a panel to include a miner, a wallet developer, and an infosec expert, and there were 100x as many miners running, and half of them were widely loved, and some of them were really controversial, I think you’re going to get a committee of just miners.
Please check me on this, but I think it’s a legit bug in the current system, independent of your views on diversity as it typically comes up.