Thanks for getting some inertia on this subject with the post Zooko!
I’ve been thinking about the founders trilemma for some time now and one thing for this specific project strikes me.
I really don’t think that the ‘community’ (or whatever it may be called) will be receptive to a continuation of distributions of funds to founders. I would think 100% allocation to core development might be the only way to sell this while minimizing the risk of tainting the ethos of the project.