A lot of good points have been made here from a lot of perspectives, proponents and opponents have been convincing.
I really enjoyed the videos from the first grant and will continue to get a lot of use out of them, showing them to friends and family.
why not?
I’m extremely sympathetic to those who would prioritize UX over all else at this phase. I send a lot of z2z transactions, perhaps more than anyone in the world right now. At my modest scale, the only wallet that I expect to work with >= 99.9% reliability is a zcashd full node.
I can get a steady stream of people jazzed about “private internet cash” and have them ready to participate in z2z fun. But, I can’t really recommend any lite wallet right now, TBH.
Ultimately “UX” is a goal almost at the highest level. But, some of the foundational means also need attention, perhaps even more so as prerequisites to quality UX. Namely, what I often call “developer ergonomics” is lacking. We need rock-solid, slick, stable libraries in common languages and guides and tutorials, boilerplates, reusable components! Deterministic and streamlined builds! We need reliable lightwallet infrastructure. We need obvious ways for developers to more easily contribute.
back on topic
The “why not” arguments are centered on competing priorities with limited resources. These are debates worth having. We don’t want to over-invest in slick videos when there is no reliable, slick wallet to point new users to.
Given the market lows, I share concerns that this is an extremely large grant at this time. BUT STILL, Zcash Media is probably the right team at the right time IMO. I basically support this grant but with caveats, preferences, suggestions and comments.
Flywheels over fireworks. Focus on durable and consistent output.
Please don’t liquidate a crapton of Zcash to give Facebook or others USD ad revenue. Focus only on the quality and quantity of the content, durable and consistent. If my friends were seeing advertisements for Zcash on Facebook it would be downright embarrassing TBH. OTOH, a library of nice videos on targeted topics could be useful for decades. Prioritize “useful for decades” over “100k views today” IMO. Views can be bought.
Try to be as thifty as possible.
A 50-second video might be worth more than a 15-minute video.
I would more vocally support a pared-down proposal that would keep Zcash Media flowing without being such a large portion of the dev fund upfront. But, I’m also sympathetic to the idea that there is some efficiency to be gained by a larger grant that spans a longer time.
Free2z
Zcash Media and Free2z have similar goals and challenges to educate new users. Free2z plans on making a bunch of videos as well. I did a UX study focus group on Free2z with some people who had never owned crypto. One of my favorite reactions was “what is 2 cash?”. These are intelligent people who can understand the importance of “private internet cash” and why it would be cool to “crowdfund without intermediaries”. But, they are a long way from downloading a wallet and putting Zcash into it and using it.
I happen to have a little kanban board with video ideas to weave into the Free2z UI -
Would Zcash Media be interested in providing content for Free2z and other projects in the ecosystem? That actually might sweeten the deal for me ;). Can you do ~50 second videos for every grant recipient who wants it? All of the governance entities? All of the major partnerships? Will Zcash Media be mostly visionary stuff or will there be some practical nitty-gritty content for nubs as well?
Also, please add a page on free2z.cash so I can link to a proper url such as free2z.cash/zcash-media (404) and not have to resort to visiting YouTube and searching to find your videos ;9