Which two other farms? Any source ?
Zeropond guys have probably already sold their GPU mining software for a nice lump some to 2-3 mining farms. And will continue making profit with the cloud mining contracts.
You currently have an advantage greater than 1.2 H/s is supposed to give because of the 30 sec limit on the default CPU miner. You canât use getnetworkhps right now because it is assuming a Poisson process for the network (it does not matter if your GPU is Poisson). The networkâs actual H/s is higher than difficulty implies because 73% of solutions are under 150 seconds. The average is still 150 seconds. Past difficulty is not being divided by the low time-to-solve numbers that would normally make current difficulty higher. So when getnetworkhps looks at difficulty to get H/s it is an underestimate. Thatâs why I believe H/s D/7 is correct. As difficulty rises after launch, H/s = D/7 may not apply and the H/s = D/10 might be correct. The 1.3 H/s Iâve calculated for your GPU should be 15% too high because (as I calculated elsewhere), you are supposed to have an advantage like this due to getting 100% of your < 30 second solves, and they make up about 15%, depending on your lower limit (23% max). After launch, 1.2 H/s seems correct, although 18 is way too little for all this.
To summarize the above: if your hash rate were H/s = 1.1 then you were supposed to get 15 blocks from D/7, but because of the 30 second limitation on CPUs, you got 100% of your under 30 seconds solves that gave you 3 extra blocks.
If this limitation on CPUs remains on mainnet, your effective hash rate could be 1.4 H/s, if there were not other non-default miners competing (botnets or GPUs).
BTW, 7.9 was probably the correct decimal because 79 / 10 = 7.9.
It appears you were on from about block 6300 to 6500, judging by the number of times a solution was found < 30 seconds. If so, 11 seconds was the fastest.
I would like to know this too. So far that has been a LOT of unsubstantiated claims thrown around. I am hoping there will be a lot of eyes on the test.(Edit: Found test times)
@trolloniex sure lives up to his name No, we are not licensing, selling, or in any other way giving our GPU miner to anyone else, and itâs not for lack of offers. However, we are not the only people capable of writing a GPU miner. If you were a big ETH farm worried about PoSâŚ
BTW are you willing to sell all your capacity to one person or do I have to send you a formal email to get more info?
What is that capacity in BTC total ?
I made a lot of english errors in my last post. Now it should be more understandable.
No way of knowing yet. This represent the entire uncertainty factor for me. If a larger ETH mining farm jumps on zcash mining it could wipe out any possible profitability from mining, contract or home mining.
12 posts were merged into an existing topic: DNA as your immutable wallet
DNA wallet conversation moved by request.
Yeah, proving a lower bound on your hashing power is possible, but proving a non-trivial upper bound is impossible as best I can tell.
We will be mining to this address during the livestream:
mtDoLkJ2fnorxzdE7xso1ScWVJbz41g7Ai
I donât expect to get more than a couple blocks during the livestream, but it will show that a single GPU in my house isnât ridiculously far off our claims. We will then do Austin Williamsâ proof over a long time period (like a day) to prove hashpower.
lshw for the mining computer
pre.cjk { font-family: "Nimbus Mono L",monospace; }p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120%; }
zeropond
description: Computer
width: 64 bits
capabilities: vsyscall32
*-core
description: Motherboard
physical id: 0
*-memory
description: System memory
physical id: 0
size: 31GiB
*-cpu
product: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz
vendor: Intel Corp.
physical id: 1
bus info: cpu@0
size: 3234MHz
capacity: 3900MHz
width: 64 bits
capabilities: fpu fpu_exception wp vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp x86-64 constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm ida arat epb pln pts dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm xsaveopt cpufreq
*-pci
description: Host bridge
product: 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 100
bus info: pci@0000:00:00.0
version: 06
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
configuration: driver=hsw_uncore
resources: irq:0
*-pci:0
description: PCI bridge
product: Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th Gen Core Processor PCI Express x16 Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1
bus info: pci@0000:00:01.0
version: 06
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pci normal_decode bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=pcieport
resources: irq:24 ioport:e000(size=4096) memory:f7e00000-f7efffff ioport:e0000000(size=276824064)
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: Hawaii XT [Radeon R9 290X]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
version: 80
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=fglrx_pci latency=0
resources: irq:32 memory:e0000000-efffffff memory:f0000000-f07fffff ioport:e000(size=256) memory:f7e00000-f7e3ffff memory:f7e40000-f7e5ffff
*-multimedia
description: Audio device
product: Hawaii HDMI Audio
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 0.1
bus info: pci@0000:01:00.1
version: 00
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=snd_hda_intel latency=0
resources: irq:30 memory:f7e60000-f7e63fff
*-usb:0
description: USB controller
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB xHCI
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 14
bus info: pci@0000:00:14.0
version: 05
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: xhci bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=xhci_hcd latency=0
resources: irq:25 memory:f7f00000-f7f0ffff
*-communication
description: Communication controller
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 16
bus info: pci@0000:00:16.0
version: 04
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=mei_me latency=0
resources: irq:28 memory:f7f1b000-f7f1b00f
*-usb:1
description: USB controller
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #2
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1a
bus info: pci@0000:00:1a.0
version: 05
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: ehci bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=ehci-pci latency=0
resources: irq:20 memory:f7f18000-f7f183ff
*-multimedia
description: Audio device
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset High Definition Audio Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1b
bus info: pci@0000:00:1b.0
version: 05
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=snd_hda_intel latency=0
resources: irq:29 memory:f7f10000-f7f13fff
*-pci:1
description: PCI bridge
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #1
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1c
bus info: pci@0000:00:1c.0
version: d5
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pci normal_decode bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=pcieport
resources: irq:16
*-pci:2
description: PCI bridge
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #3
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1c.2
bus info: pci@0000:00:1c.2
version: d5
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pci normal_decode bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=pcieport
resources: irq:18 ioport:d000(size=4096) memory:f7d00000-f7dfffff ioport:f0900000(size=1048576)
*-network
description: Ethernet interface
product: RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:03:00.0
logical name: enp3s0
version: 0c
serial: e0:3f:49:e7:c2:35
size: 10Mbit/s
capacity: 1Gbit/s
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical tp mii 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd 1000bt 1000bt-fd autonegotiation
configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=r8169 driverversion=2.3LK-NAPI duplex=half firmware=rtl8168g-2_0.0.1 02/06/13 latency=0 link=no multicast=yes port=MII speed=10Mbit/s
resources: irq:27 ioport:d000(size=256) memory:f7d00000-f7d00fff memory:f0900000-f0903fff
*-pci:3
description: PCI bridge
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port #8
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1c.7
bus info: pci@0000:00:1c.7
version: d5
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pci normal_decode bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=pcieport
resources: irq:19 ioport:c000(size=4096) memory:f7c00000-f7cfffff
*-network
description: Wireless interface
product: RTL8821AE 802.11ac PCIe Wireless Network Adapter
vendor: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@0000:04:00.0
logical name: wlp4s0
version: 00
serial: 54:27:1e:5e:d8:57
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: bus_master cap_list ethernet physical wireless
configuration: broadcast=yes driver=rtl8821ae driverversion=4.2.0-42-generic firmware=N/A ip=192.168.1.238 latency=0 link=yes multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11abgn
resources: irq:31 ioport:c000(size=256) memory:f7c00000-f7c03fff
*-usb:2
description: USB controller
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family USB EHCI #1
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1d
bus info: pci@0000:00:1d.0
version: 05
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: ehci bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=ehci-pci latency=0
resources: irq:23 memory:f7f17000-f7f173ff
*-isa
description: ISA bridge
product: H87 Express LPC Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f
bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.0
version: 05
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: isa bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=lpc_ich latency=0
resources: irq:0
*-storage
description: SATA controller
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller 1 [AHCI mode]
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f.2
bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.2
version: 05
width: 32 bits
clock: 66MHz
capabilities: storage ahci_1.0 bus_master cap_list
configuration: driver=ahci latency=0
resources: irq:26 ioport:f070(size=8) ioport:f060(size=4) ioport:f050(size=8) ioport:f040(size=4) ioport:f020(size=32) memory:f7f16000-f7f167ff
*-serial UNCLAIMED
description: SMBus
product: 8 Series/C220 Series Chipset Family SMBus Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 1f.3
bus info: pci@0000:00:1f.3
version: 05
width: 64 bits
clock: 33MHz
configuration: latency=0
resources: memory:f7f15000-f7f150ff ioport:f000(size=32)
*-scsi
physical id: 2
logical name: scsi5
capabilities: emulated
*-cdrom
description: DVD-RAM writer
physical id: 0.0.0
bus info: scsi@5:0.0.0
logical name: /dev/cdrom
logical name: /dev/cdrw
logical name: /dev/dvd
logical name: /dev/dvdrw
logical name: /dev/sr0
capabilities: audio cd-r cd-rw dvd dvd-r dvd-ram
configuration: status=nodisc
*-scsi
physical id: 1
bus info: scsi@6
logical name: scsi6
capabilities: scsi-host
configuration: driver=usb-storage
Is the test being run on a Radeon R9 290X or a 390X ?
The card is an ASUS Radeon R9 390X
Hereâs a snapshot of the card status
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
Core (MHz) Memory (MHz)
Current Clocks : 1070 1500
Current Peak : 1070 1500
Configurable Peak Range : [300-1500] [150-2000]
GPU load : 100%
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series
Sensor 0: Temperature - 88.00 C
OK youâre not going to believe it because right after we shut off the stream we got a block:
block (00117bac1051aa425ee4306a936810b864388b4356d2647ae07906a06574492a)
[20-09-2016 05:45:24:71] (submission) GPU 0: mined block accepted (target: 1f30b
ace).
You can verify that this block mined to the address I posted earlier.
Weâll stop the stream now, but weâll do Austin Williamsâ proof ASAP.
Is there anyone who was closely watching the mining test have any comments on the results?
Everything seemed good except whatever software was on the phone trying to stream to YouTube was terrible.
So with this test is there an estimate of the advantage that GPUâs will have on CPUâs? Like is it a 10x, 20x, etc multiplier confirmed?