Claymore's Miner only--> GPU-->INTENSITY-->SOLRATE

Mining
61

MSI R7950 220-225 Sol/s 1150/1500

Powercolor 7870 Myst 140-144 1200/1500

62

Rx 480 = 225 sols/s
Rx 470 = 195-200 sols/s

63

R7 360 nitro 2 g ~ 85 s/s
i-6

64

R9 295X2 8G ~ 500s/s (claymore 9.1) -nofee 1 -i 6

65

R9 295x2 ~ 580 s/s - i 6 nofee 1 (claymore 9.2)

67

P61221-140557.jpg3357×2518 2.99 MB

R7 360 nitro 2g ~86 s/s
Gigabyte 7850 2g ~ 118 s/s
Saphire 7850 2g ~108 s/s
R9 280x 3g vapor-x ~ 204 s/s
R9 295x2 8g ~ 275+270=525 s/s
-i 6
-nofee 0
-catalyst 15.12
-claymore 9.2

68

Can anybody describe the cases in which the driver 16.xx better than 15.12 ???

69

7950 gigabyte 3g ~190 s/s (claymore 9.3) i-8

70

Hi,
How you get 190 on 7950 ?
What definitions you set ? and drivers?

Thanks

71

-i 8
Catalyst 15.12
Win 8.1 (64)
Claymore 9.2 v

72

Thanks for the info,

And about temperature? Do you configure any limitation?

Whats the temperature that your graphic have on mining ?

73

36.6 °C
On the balcony -15 °C
Fan 5 %)))

74

I understand now :slight_smile:

Mine is 82 °C, with fan at 82%… the ambient is around 12 °C

I need to put in a place more cold…

75

1 Like
76

V.10 released
No change for r9 series

1 Like
77

My R9 290x increased by 5%, 290 not.

1 Like
78

V.11 released
No change for r9 series?

79

R9 390 nitro 8g ~360
R9 390 gygabite 8g ~360
R9 295x2 ~340+340=680
7950 gygabyte ~ 260
R9 280x ~260
Claym 12.1 xubuntu 15.04 fglrx

80

All on hynix
-Post must be at least 20 characters

81

Sapphire Radeon R9-290 about 350. Not sure why these results seem to be significantly higher than other 290s in this thread. Slightly overclocked with Wattman, otherwise no real changes to settings.

Untitled-1.jpg665×573 237 KB

1 Like