Conversation about structural change for ZCG forum?

Hi, I’m taking off my hat as team lead for Birdcalls and now i’m just writing to the community as plain-ol-Sunny. I know that other people than me have expressed the opinion that the ZCG process is toxic and discouraging. But I don’t think it has to be that way forever. It could be structured differently. It could be better. So in case there’s a meta-discussion to be had here, I’m creating a space for it here.

I’ll be recusing myself from this discussion since in my capacity as team lead of Birdcalls, I’m currently an aggrieved party :sweat_smile:. I’ll probably also take a break from Zcash again for a while because I already feel burnt out, but I do want to reiterate that I believe in Zcash and I want y’all to be strong.

Here’s a few relevant quotes from the past week:

I think that an interesting way to think about a community forum is as a social common space where the shared resource is our ‘focused attention.’ It’s easy for forum discussions to devolve into a tragedy of the commons where our limited resource, our focused attention, is wasted.

One of my favorite thinkers on how to successfully govern social common spaces was Elinor Ostrim. She won the Nobel Prize having spent most of her life studying real world situations where communities successfully shared scarce water resources for hundreds to thousands of years, without having to resort to privatization.

Communities avoid the tragedy of the commons by taking the time and care to put in place structures to properly incentivize responsible stewardship of common resources.

Here’s the Ostrom Workshop: Ostrom Workshop: Indiana University
Who knows, maybe Zcash could hire a consultant affiliated with the Ostrom Workshop to make professional suggestions for how to better structure the ZCG program. If you want them to do that though, please please don’t make them submit it as a grant proposal to the current public forum.

I’m just tossing out a few ideas to get people thinking.

One last thing to throw out there for the discussion -

I noticed this new user account because its very first ‘like’ was my comment saying I was too tired to keep responding in the grants forum. Then I realized that the account had already read 394 posts in 1 hour of read time. I thought it was a little odd. Then I remembered that we live in a world now where it would be trivial for an LLM to be trained on the Zcash forum and then unleashed into the forums to spew mostly coherent nonsense that wastes everyone’s time and attention, forever.

In my opinion, HHIROSHIMA is a little sus.

Perhaps it’s time to add two more reputation features to community profiles: a trust graph of whether someone originally invited you into the community, if so who that was; and a badge if anyone in the community has ever met you in person.

Last thing. Now I’m putting on my hat as a privacy professional: don’t forget that the state department doesn’t have to get you delisted from the exchanges if they can just insert enough monkey wrenches into your system that you fail to function.

Okay, I’m done here for now. I’m recusing myself now. Furthermore, I’m going to turn off notifications for Zash for a while. So if anyone specifically wants a response from me then please ask Jason or Zooko to send me a ping via text.

All best,
Plain Ol’ Sunny

1 Like

It’s really hard to take you seriously anymore, i get the impression that you feel caught out and to be honest, that is my opinion.

You didn’t want to help at all, but saw the opportunity to make money quickly. That didn’t work out and now everyone else is to blame, although - and I’m sure of this - the majority of members here paid attention to the cost-benefit factor and now you feel totally attacked. Finally stop this manipulative behavior.

This drama what you are doing here meanwhile is deeply ridiculous and no, I don’t have to open a second account to tell you my opinion. :man_facepalming:

Agree with this point, because I have already thought about it too and urge everyone to keep
a watchful eye on it.

3 Likes

Hello! I’d love to chat with you in private, just to hear you out. Ping me.

3 Likes

Yes, these types of accounts are bots that create an account and “like” as many posts as possible to gain forum trust levels. They then remain dormant until someone posts something wallet related like “help my ZEC is stuck” then they send out a DM with fake “customer support” links. I delete or restrict trust levels for several of these types of accounts per week.

I also remove one or two accounts per week that are trying to post clearly AI generated content.

But that said, there are more active readers like Hiroshima who are real people that have a lot of time on their hands to be active on the forum. That doesn’t automatically make them a LLM AI bot.

We do have forum titles that I manually assign to users like @Autotunafish and @pacu who are trusted known members of the community

Regarding users questioning the cost of grant proposals ie: “price dumping” as Pacu put it. The entire purpose of having the discussion on an open public forum ( not just a private conversation with the applicant and @ZcashGrants ) is to question and get feedback from the broader community about the application.

The discussions here are ultimately something ZCG can take under advisement when considering the grant, or can choose to ignore all together.

8 Likes

Hiroshima is definitely not a bot. There’s no doubt about it. Bots don’t have feelings.

There’s a lot of frustration about the market in all of us, it’s noticeable. But we need to be able to find a way to communicate without accusations and resentment.

1 Like

Are you asserting that you know @HHIROSHIMA isn’t an AI? That’s certainly what @artkor is saying.

I have strong reason to believe that neither @Shawn nor @artkor is an AI. But apriori, I have no strong evidence either way with respect to @HHIROSHIMA .

I think @machinesunmachine makes a good point that tools that help make that determination are needed… maybe even an entire communication platform that’s robust to inauthentic messaging…

1 Like

I’m really starting to wonder what kind of stuff you guys are smoking. This is not normal anymore and such people are developers for zcash. Until just now I thought highly of you but now you have disqulified yourself to such an extent that I won’t even read your posts anymore and that as an AI :upside_down_face:

But before I forget, thanks for the compliment anyway.

2 Likes

i agree, u can’t be AI, too authentic

unless ur one of the top new AGI models :rofl:

2 Likes

Yes, based on interactions with them and usage patterns on the forum I can say Hiroshima is not an AI.

2 Likes

Is this to be an empathy test? Capillary dilation of the so-called blush response? Fluctuation of the pupil? Involuntary dilation of the iris?

The fact is that the only-slightly-uncanny valley is not coming, it’s already here.

I’ve read way (way way) too much of this forum and I don’t think HH is a bot, but these days, especially if you’re being observant and very honest, it’s sometimes difficult to tell.

Anything we can do to promote awareness of where info is coming from is good. Protecting humans, particularly naive humans, from spam and propaganda is not easy and is important for a well functioning social group. The under-appreciated job of the mod is hard and getting harder all the time.

4 Likes

Every forum member will have to perform the Baseline Test in person:

:sweat_smile:

I tried to upload a cool image but I couldn’t get the forum to accept mine… :frowning:

so thanks for getting a correct reference into the right place :slight_smile:

1 Like

Spoken like a well-trained guardian replicant. Welcome to the forums Nexus 6-1740617817!

“You’re not even close to baseline.” – The Overseer From Blade Runner

1 Like

Well… also I’m hopeful that we’ll be welcoming to Intelligences of all origins.

1 Like