I don’t understand what you’re suggesting here. It seems like there’s some confusion about what it means to have a “t-address”.
1 Like
i am not sure what you mean here, but overall it needs to be pointed out that zcash in generell is confusing to new users. all those different transaction/address types are a mess - compared to other privacy chains like monero.
nobody should have to learn about what wallet will not expose my transaction to anyone.
we are building solutions to a problem that could easily be solved by going z-z. mainly out of fear to not get the paycheck by the end of the month. (orgs, devs,…)
I have a question: would the unified address be a combination of a transparent address with a shielded address? If I didn’t misunderstand, I believe that one day the transparent address will be abandoned and we will only have the unified address.
A unified address can combine a transparent address and a shielded address, but it doesn’t need to (i.e. it can have only shielded addresses).
I think the goal is to only have unified addresses yes, but it seems unlikely that everyone will migrate to them.
2 Likes
It’s up to us to build that migration path. We have a chance to do things much better with the deprecation and replacement of the zcashd wallet.
4 Likes