I was pretty sure by all metrics it was heartwood - (including a metric I was arguing against. I 
t1Xcho! - 
)
On a slightly more serious note though:
This doesn’t sound good for the “test community coin holder polling” mechanism for the dev fund discussions that quite a few reference.
I think the ECC was using this as a test run for some of the “community” weight in the dev fund selection process. I would argue that this kinda makes the exercise a failure. How do you think it would be better improved for the actual “coin holders” vote as it were?
@amiller what do you think? you were pretty involved with that thread. any ideas?
I know you are pretty new still @elenita but could you ask the ECC for us please.
Thank you!
Steve