@mistfpga, I like and support your idea here. I agree that a choice of burn/lockup/roll mechanism needs to be done in many of the proposal, and it makes sense to “factor out” the choice, and enumerate+analyze the options separately here.
Please do. Permanent burn was concretely proposed several times, so a comprehensive discussion of options must include that. We will discuss the implications of the various options, and if permanent burning has particularly bad regulatory implications (which I don’t think is true) then presumably it will not be chosen.
BTW, terminology: to my ears, “burn” means permanent burn. The other things you call “burn” but which actually move the issuance to later and/or others, please find other terms for… Perhaps “lockup”, “rollout”, “deferral”, etc.