This is a placeholder. I am currently writing the pull request for a proposal that describes different burn mechanisms. One of my proposals relies on it and so do a couple of others.
It has been discussed in various places on this forum so I don’t see it as a completely new proposal. It is a supplement to various parts of others, adding more definition to them. I will only be using comments from the proposals threads where burn has been discussed. I think it would be good to have a formalised view on the burn options so people can say use burn_rolling or burn_ no_redeem and maybe a couple of others and it will just be in this proposal.
I don’t really know how to go about doing something modular like this, but we will see. if it doesn’t look like it will work I will just set up some burn proposals (I guess this is like a terminology definition proposal)
To be fair I only really care about rolling burn, but if I am doing one, I might as well do the lot.
I aim to get it into GitHub asap then update this post with the proposal so we can gawk at it.
This is using the zip process properly right? im not breaking it by trying to do this am I? hurm. actually I will forum them first. I am writing them up anyway, probably best to double check that they will be okay in GitHub.
I really appreciate your help, thank you.